Unsubing for deployment, JA

5 posts ยท Feb 6 2003 to Feb 9 2003

From: Mark Sykes <tardis@b...>

Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:45:01 +1000

Subject: RE: Unsubing for deployment, JA

> At 6:20 PM -0800 5/2/2003, Michael Brown wrote:

You know us but what about the lurkers?

;-)

MarkS

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:17:05 -0600

Subject: RE: Unsubing for deployment, JA

> Opsec?

I kept waiting for 'I could tell you, but then...'

The_Beast

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 19:52:41 PST

Subject: Re: Unsubing for deployment, JA

> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:17:05 -0600 devans@nebraska.edu writes:

The new version is "...I would have to report both of us to Security and the
FBI would be most unhappy..."

From: John D. Hamill <finnmaccool@e...>

Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:55:25 -0800 (PST)

Subject: RE: Unsubing for deployment, JA

> --- Mark Sykes <tardis@byterocky.net> wrote:

When large military equipment moves to a port it isn't a secret, all you have
to do is sit by the highway or railline that connects the military base with
the port, and watch the iron roll by. I was on I37 last week watching military
equipment on civilian flatbeds roll by going south from San Antonio. From
there there's only one place it could be going, and that's Corpus Christi.
Opsec is not possible in a deployment of this size, especially when so much of
the forces start out in your home territory.

From: Kevin <Kevin@k...>

Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 00:02:17 -0000

Subject: Re: Unsubing for deployment, JA

The news program showed the Brit kit being loaded up in Germany, what more can
you say

Kev

[quoted original message omitted]