From: Mark Sykes <tardis@b...>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:45:01 +1000
Subject: RE: Unsubing for deployment, JA
> At 6:20 PM -0800 5/2/2003, Michael Brown wrote: You know us but what about the lurkers? ;-) MarkS
From: Mark Sykes <tardis@b...>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:45:01 +1000
Subject: RE: Unsubing for deployment, JA
> At 6:20 PM -0800 5/2/2003, Michael Brown wrote: You know us but what about the lurkers? ;-) MarkS
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:17:05 -0600
Subject: RE: Unsubing for deployment, JA
> Opsec? I kept waiting for 'I could tell you, but then...' The_Beast
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 19:52:41 PST
Subject: Re: Unsubing for deployment, JA
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:17:05 -0600 devans@nebraska.edu writes: The new version is "...I would have to report both of us to Security and the FBI would be most unhappy..."
From: John D. Hamill <finnmaccool@e...>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject: RE: Unsubing for deployment, JA
> --- Mark Sykes <tardis@byterocky.net> wrote: When large military equipment moves to a port it isn't a secret, all you have to do is sit by the highway or railline that connects the military base with the port, and watch the iron roll by. I was on I37 last week watching military equipment on civilian flatbeds roll by going south from San Antonio. From there there's only one place it could be going, and that's Corpus Christi. Opsec is not possible in a deployment of this size, especially when so much of the forces start out in your home territory.
From: Kevin <Kevin@k...>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 00:02:17 -0000
Subject: Re: Unsubing for deployment, JA
The news program showed the Brit kit being loaded up in Germany, what more can you say Kev [quoted original message omitted]