From: Mark A. Siefert <cthulhu@c...>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 20:28:01 -0400
Subject: Titans for DSII?
Hello Everyone: I was curious if anyone has come up with any rules ideas for WH40K Titans for Dirtside II? Later,
From: Mark A. Siefert <cthulhu@c...>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 20:28:01 -0400
Subject: Titans for DSII?
Hello Everyone: I was curious if anyone has come up with any rules ideas for WH40K Titans for Dirtside II? Later,
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 21:36:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Titans for DSII?
> At 07:28 PM 10/21/96 -0500, you wrote: I've THOUGHT about doing rules for Titans, but that's not the same thing, is it?
From: Larry Jeselon <ljeselon@c...>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 22:39:43 -0400
Subject: Re: Titans for DSII?
> At 09:36 PM 21/10/96 -0400, Allan Goodall wrote: I have been working on the rules for the Eldar Titans but seem to be getting nowhere quick. Everytime I think I have something worked out, my buddy says "..But what about this?" and blows all my calculations to hell:) Someday soon, I hope:)
From: Rick Rutherford <rickr@s...>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 09:40:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Titans for DSII?
> On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Mark A. Siefert wrote: > Hello Everyone: Repaint it with a great big bullseye that has numbers marking the scores on the rings.
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 11:23:01 -0400
Subject: Re: Titans for DSII?
> On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Mark A. Siefert wrote: > Hello Everyone: Yes (or, well... only Gargants and Eldar Titans, really; I haven't tried any Imperials in battle yet...). All my notes are back home, so this'll be a little unstructured and unspecific, but here goes: Titans is the GW term for large combat walkers. These are almost exclusively two-legged - there are, or were, two small Eldar centauroid Knights too, but they're not 'official' any more. Most Titans have two to four weapon mounts, and are effective in close combat - being trod upon by something twenty meters tall wouldn't be too good even for a MBT, much less an infantry man! Although Titans are classified into broad classes (Warlords, Phantoms etc), different Titans within a single class can have widely differing weaponry. Therefore, my basic idea was to make a standard 'chassi', or template, for each class; each template would have hardpoints of a certain class and couldn't mount any weapon bigger than that. I haven't come very far on this project, though. Basically, Titans (Impy/Eldar) are size lots walkers (of course); I've used: Size 7: Warlords, Phantoms, Warlock Titans (and possibly the Squat war machines too) Size 6: Reavers, Slasha Gargants Size 5: Warhounds, Revenants, Mekboy Gargants Size 4: Knights, Stompas Modular vehicles: Imperators, Mega- and Great Gargants (... Great Gargants are four modules (two feet, belly/lower arms, head/shoulders OR two feet, right sid and left side); dunno about the Mega and Imperator yet)), and of course the Squat Land Trains. The weapons shouldn't be too hard to work out - DFFGs work very well as the various Melta/Plasma weapons, Lasers as Lasers (so a HEL-5 could represent an Imperial Defence Laser as well as an Eldar Pulsar), and so on. I have introduced some new mobility categories - Fast Walker (IIRC, I gave it 15" movement; this represents the fastest scout walkers and knights and shouldn't be allowed on bigger walkers), Fast Skimmer (Jetbikes are supposed to be _fast_) and pop-up skimmers (can be added to any skimmer vehicle; but it is a very distinctive trait of the Eldar army, and I really didn't want to make my Tempests VTOLs <g>); I don't remember the costs and speeds for them now, but I'll get back on this. The most difficult part (IMO) are the various protective gadgets used on Titans. As Mike and Jon put it - 'you might as well write TARGET in neon letters'... For those of you who haven't played GW's Space Marine, there are two main schools of Titan protection: Shields and Holoflage. Imperials and Orks use energy shields which deflect/absorb the energy of incoming attacks; and each attack so deflected weakens the shields. Enough concentrated fire will wear them down completely, leaving the Titan/Gargant vulnerable to attack. Imperial shields are more reliable than Ork ones, but the basic idea is the same. Eldar use another idea entirely: they DO write 'target' in neon letters. Trouble is, they don't write it on the Titan, but rather in the air some meters to the side...:) Anyway, their Titans are protected by broad-spectrum 'hologram shields' (I use the term 'holoflage', but I don't remember where I got it from...), which disturbs enemy targetting - the faster the Titan moves, the better the protection. However, it gives no protection whatsoever from area attacks, so artillery is a very good way to kill Eldar Titans. In DSII terms, Ork/Imperial shields are 'extra hits' - each valid hit takes down one shield. (Imperial shields are supposed to be able to be restored during the battle, but as I said I haven't really used Imps.) When all shields are down, the next hit will be able to damage the Titan/Gargant. I've played a little with 1 shield = 1 mass/slot/whatever the term is in DSII; it seems to work fairly well. A size 7 Titan would have about 6 shields (gargants could be more, though); while a size 5 Warhound should have 2 shields. For the Eldar, things are different. The Holoflage gives the Titan a secondary die (which it needs, since its primary die is a D4 and everything counts as 'close range'...); the size of this secondary die depends on how far the Titan moved in its last activation: Moved: Die: ECM equivalent: Moved half or more of a 'full move': D12 Superior Moved, but less than half: D10 Enhanced Fired from overwatch: D8 Basic (ie, didn't move at all) While a D12 is very high, this corresponds to 'Charge' orders in Space Marine; this causes all direct-fire shots to miss on a D6 roll of 2 or higher. The slower speeds correspond to Advance (miss on 3+) and First Fire (miss on 4+) respectively. Space Marine doesn't use special rules for missiles, but the holoflage should work as some sort of ECM. However, this too might be too weak (...since the Titans have very little space for point defences), and holoflage is supposed to be VERY effective against all direct fire weapons (including missiles). I gave this gadget a mass of 2 - it should probably vary with the size of the walker, but I couldn't fit the weapons I wanted onto a Phantom if the holoflage was bigger than that! The Phantom template would look something like... Size 7 Fusion Powered Combat Walker, armour 6 (or 7; haven't decided yet), Anti-Personnel Charges (don't even remember the acronym right now), Holoflage; two Enhanced and one Superior targetting system. Hard points: 2 Arm mounts: Class 5 hard points (each able to mount a HEL-5, DFFG-5, or one of those nifty Eldar weapons - Tremor Cannon (-5), Distortion Cannon (-5) or Power Fist - for close combat against other Titans!) 2 Wing mounts: Class 3 hard points (able to mount either a HEL-3 or an Artillery-2; no extra arty ammo, and only smoke or frag rounds available. Eldar use lasers to kill armour, not arty...) (...and here is the reason I had to make the holoflage so small; I have a Phantom with two Pulsars and two Wing Missile Launchers (arty-2), and wanted it to fit into the template <g>) Cost-wise: Titans are EXPENSIVE. They are supposed to be - a Phantom should cost (and be able to beat about half of the time) ten tracked MBTs; a Warlord (with four hard points and six shields) should be able to take on fifteen MBTs. (I'm using the Leman Russ or Predator as a measuring norm...) I don't remember what cost I gave the holoflage gadget, but the final cost for an armed Phantom landed around 1500 points. Oh well. I'll get back on this topic when I've typed my notes in. It'll take a while, though - far too many reports to write in school right now :(
From: Brian Lojeck <lojeck@r...>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 11:37:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Titans for DSII?
> On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Allan Goodall wrote: > At 07:28 PM 10/21/96 -0500, you wrote: I'm working on rules for my mekboy,great, and mega gargants now...
From: Steven Guffey <magetower@r...>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 20:24:08 -0400
Subject: RE: Titans for DSII?
---------- From: Rick Rutherford[SMTP:rickr@digex.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 1996 5:40 AM To: Full Thrust Mailing List Subject: Re: Titans for DSII? > On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Mark A. Siefert wrote: > Hello Everyone: > Repaint it with a great big bullseye that has numbers marking the How true. With the size of those things who needs accuracy. guff