Time to speak of many... Re: Gas Skimmers, Wings and Things

4 posts ยท Dec 16 1998 to Dec 16 1998

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 12:28:51 -0600

Subject: Time to speak of many... Re: Gas Skimmers, Wings and Things

Schoon, the man, said:
~~~
> Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:

> *****

Generally a very nice job Robert.
~~~

And I say: Agreed! People, and Los in particular, shame me on my meagre
attempts at
writing. But, not enough to stop trying... ;->=
~~~

Then Schoon, the myth, said:
> Everything was ready, as he finished strapping into the flight deck.

Three ships lost in a week seems excessive to me. Not even hardhat divers,
experimental pilots, or even high risk miners loose that many people. Look at
the economics as well. For the ships alone, that's a 264 MUcr loss. Idoubt
they'll make that up with sales.
~~~

And I, the base reality say: Had the same feeling, though, we don't know how
many are involved in the 'mining'. Or, how strategic this site is. Perhaps
it's the only
scoop-able
gas ball in several light years. Or, we can pretend he meant the three pulled
up stakes and headed for simpler locals...
~~~

Then Schoon, the legend, said:
> *****

I'd consider increasing the hull integrity. If operations in the atmosphere
are that dangerous, I think they want something that could withstand a "bump"
or two.

Schoon
~~~

You ain't lied yet, bro. Though the term weak hull doesn't necessarily mean
unable to take punishment, I'd be assuming at least the cabin would be built
like a brick s**t house (crude American aphorism that I've heard at least
three Brits use).

This has certainly gotten me thinking about my Texacoan Free State Navy. My
idea was that the interstellar corporation Texaco was one of the big losers in
the corporate wars, and that small group of company loyalists would make
a thriving colony-state out of some out-of-the-way holdings. What I need
is
some physics/astronomy insights: do deuterium and tritrium still figure
in high grade fusion reactions? Would the heavier isotopes be more or less
common in older, and pre-nova-salted, systems? Ok, not needed for
gaming, but useful in fluff.

On another topic, totally, can I get some pointers on the
Wings-and-Things
packet? When I bought it, I thought it made specific variants on standard GZG
figs, but now I'm not so sure. Not a problem, I have plenty of ideas,
including one or two pieces being ships themselves, but does anyone have
ideas, either official, Jon/KR/Nic, or likely suggestions, rest of list?

The_Beast

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>

Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:58:22 -0800

Subject: Re: Time to speak of many... Re: Gas Skimmers, Wings and Things

> devans@uneb.edu aka The Beast wrote:

[snip]

> I'd consider increasing the hull integrity. If operations in the

> You ain't lied yet, bro. Though the term weak hull doesn't necessarily

What I meant by this was the damage track:

> Damage Track: 4; [o/o/o/*]

1 hit and it takes a threshold, which could be catastrophic if something
important "gives."

From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>

Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 10:18:47 +1100

Subject: RE: Time to speak of many... Re: Gas Skimmers, Wings and Things

The other thing is, if you hit something in a gas giant, chances are it's
either the planet's core or an incoming asteroid anyway....

'Neath Southern Skies
http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
*****
They seek him here, they seek him there; Those Frenchies seek him everywhere.
Is he in heaven or is he in hell? That damned elusive, Pimpernel.
        - 'The Scarlet Pimpernel', Baroness Emma Orkzy

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Andrew Martin <Al.Bri@x...>

Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:41:12 +1300

Subject: Re: Time to speak of many... Re: Gas Skimmers, Wings and Things

> Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:
Or it could be those intelligent gas giant aliens who provide those ultra
concentrated patches of H2!