thoughts on Re: NAC - American style [LONG]

3 posts ยท Jan 6 2005 to Jan 8 2005

From: Warbeads@a...

Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:57:16 EST

Subject: thoughts on Re: NAC - American style [LONG]

In a message dated 1/6/05 1:56:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> JBrewer@webtv.net writes:
I have two problems with the NAC as written up by  Jon Tuffley - The
rather confusing nomenclature of the ships as presented in FB1, and the
future history which has the collapse of the US and the  re-emergance of
the British Empire. I don't disparage the dream of a return to the days of
colonial glory, and the idea of the US falling into a chaotic distopia is, to
say the least, pragmatically amusing to some Brits, but it does come to seem a
little insulting to American players, as well as somewhat less than
believable, considering that our economy continues to
grow, thanks to immigration - legal & otherwise - from South &  Central
America.  Besides, that sci-fi convention has been done to death  since
the late 70's. It has also inspired many trivial debates on the List
concerning American title peerage and whether or not the British military
could put down an insurgency in America, let alone a potental insurgency in
every country in the Western Hemisphere south of the 49th parallel.

So for the American players of FT, and any Brits interested, allow me to
postulate an alternate future history of the NAC for Y.O.U. [Your Own
Universe] as a date addendum to the background history on  pages 42-43
of the rule book 2nd edition...

<snip a well developed alternative>

There have been several 'USA-centric' models discussed before.   Perhaps
it
has just slipped my mind/attention span but has anyone wrote an
alternative when the USA AND Canada divide up, sectional groupings occur and
parts of the Canada and USA join UK to make the variant NAC, and the rest of
the
USA/Canada
(and Mexico/parts of Central America) makes up several smaller
'nations'? To balance this one would possibly have to adjust the ESU slightly
I expect.

Right now you have a pyramid of power categories of nation (first tier
NAC/ESU, second tier NSL/FSE, and various wider 'steps'  as you proceed
down the ziggurat shaped 'power pyramid.') By fracturing the NAC and the ESU
somewhat you create a setting more akin to the number of 'world powers' found
in 1890's or 1914...

Gracias,

From: Paul M. M. Jacobus <paul@o...>

Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:00:39 -0500 (EST)

Subject: Re: thoughts on Re: NAC - American style [LONG]

> Right now you have a pyramid of power categories of nation (first tier

Interesting concept I never thought about. Anyone drawn this thing out?

-P.

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:52:01 -0600

Subject: Re: thoughts on Re: NAC - American style [LONG]

> Interesting concept I never thought about. Anyone drawn this thing out?

Jerry Han's GZGpedia has the info, including both canon and non entities;
haven't heard it mentioned or if there's been any updating lately.

Funny, inspite of the numbers, I always thought that ESU was the junior
partner in the loose partnership with the FSE. Probably due to the
personality of the local FSE commander. ;->=

The_Beast