From: Izenberg, Noam <Noam.Izenberg@j...>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 09:44:31 -0400
Subject: Re: Thoughts on FB3 +
Re: FB3 New rules: I don't think FB3 is the place for new (spinal mounts/HBW's etc.) or revamped old (like MT missile) rules. That's what _FT3_ is for, at least as I understand it. New Fleets: > ... Do we all agree that FB3 at least should have UN and IF? I'd agree to that, + OU, Japan, LLAR, IC, PAU, Though I'd assume that some minor powers would have alot of purchases and conversions of extant/obsolete ships of the major powers. Several of those (and other minor powers could be listed in FB3 w/o a new mini line - just some new quarter-page SSD's (with or w/o small illustrations). I recuse myself regarding New Israel due to personal bias. ----- > From laserlight and aebrain: > I have a twofold problem with these ships: I disagree. It's a specialized ship design that differentiates IF ships from other fleets. My early NI designs (and current spcialized designs) have the same off -center arcs. It makes for a different fighting strategy. > It's very minimaxing to have a "spiral of doom". Hardly. It's another tactic to learn to deal with. Laser: > I play vector almost exclusively--as my teammembers in the I've played Cinematic almost exclusively when face to face. The stealth ships I've playtested all have off center arcs and used the Death Spiral to pretty good effect (as Indy can testify). I can't say how it would work vs. someone well prepared for it. It's certainly defeatable. ------ > From Tony (Re: NI supplement): > It would have to be something along the lines of an It's a can of worms. If Jon decides to approve a couple things like this, then everyone and his brother will want to get their pet nation 'approved for use with.' I'd love to see some official GZG-Brigade alliance regarding NI (some subset of Brigade models - like one per ship class as in FB1 - becoming 'official' or 'approved' FT minis). But I'm not going to holding my breath. > Plus, of course, it would be out of date very rapidly I beg to differ. ;-) Noam - slowly updating New Israel to ca. 2193. Here's the timeline after FB1 (2183): 2184 - Jan. 26, a convoy raid by Islamic Federation ships outside Naveh system employs a full cruiser/destroyer group. The engagement initiates a review of deep space patrol, convoy, and hunter doctrine. Fear of increased IF aggression blends with escalation of the Kra'Vak hostilities to spike Naval production. 2185 - The Third Solar War sputters into the First InterSentinent War. 2187 - After replenishing most defense fleets from the losses of the Homeland war, NI leases some of its ship construction capabilities to the powers gearing up to fight the Kra'vak incursion. 2188 - The Battleship Dayan and a small contingent from the Deep Range Escort Fleet join the multinational force for expected first contact rendezvous with the "Sa'Vasku." 2189 - A minor New Israel-Islamic Federation skirmish is jumped by Kra'Vak raiders, who attack both sides indiscriminantly. The KV destroy half of both human forces and are pursuing the remnants when the Phalons arrive and attack the Kra'vak. The Phalons gain the upper hand and start to barter/ransom the initial combatants for which side they will join in the original conflict. Before negotiations are complete, a Sa'Vasku force shows up and destroys all fleets in the vicinity. 2191 Kra'Vak expeditionary forces are turned back at Sabra (barely, with both the aid of Japanese forces, and the surprise and timely arrival of a small Sa'Vasku force) and Gan (decisively). Casualties of the Sabra conflict include some of the last foreign constructed capital ships in the fleet; the CVL Diaspora (NAC Inflexible conversion) is destroyed and the BB Meir (NSL Maria Von Borgund) is severely damaged and scrapped. 2193 - New Israel, with Gan (E-Indi) located closer to the Core Worlds than many of the Inner Colonies, agrees to coordinate a significant portion of its deep-space and assault forces with the UNSC to join defense of the Core.