The new US Army APC the Stinger

3 posts ยท Jul 1 2002 to Jul 2 2002

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:29:44 -0400

Subject: RE: Re: The new US Army APC the Stinger

From: Scott Siebold gamers@ameritech.net
> Actually the Abrams was to have cost $1.5 million apiece when the

Is that "cost of a single copy by itself" or "cost including R&D" or "cost
including spares and maintenance" or what? All three figures could be correct
for the same vehicle, depending on what you're talking about.

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 13:04:03 EDT

Subject: Re: The new US Army APC the Stinger

> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:03:34 -0600 "B Lin" <lin@rxkinetix.com> writes:

Roger that!

> Plus not every project suffers from creep, some actually stick to

Sounds okay to me. Range from 101 to 200% sounds adequate. Numbers guys, what
does the various methods produce in range, mean, median, etc?

Works in the field guys, what seems 'gut check' numbers in your experience?

> --Binhan

Gracias,

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 13:04:03 EDT

Subject: Re: The new US Army APC the Stinger

On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:01:12 -0400 "laserlight@quixnet.net"
> <laserlight@quixnet.net> writes:

Sems a bit generous... I have not dione the math but gut tells me it's low in
most cases and way low in worst cases...

> Or 1d6, a 6 is "5 + reroll". "This frigate that was budgeted at

Now that sounds better. Limits on number of rerolls?

> --------------------------------------------------------------------

Gracias,