From: Adam Benedict Canning <dahak@d...>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:50:25 -0000
Subject: RE: The GZG Digest V2 #973
> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 19:16:32 +0100 I made it 320. In that I went for a what it has and percentages basis rather than min maxing. Its not a very MM design after all. Since you seem to be correct I have discovered that enginering felt that telling you about 2 Submunitions packs was inappropriate. Which takes TMF to 320. Now I just have to work out how one factors an chief engineer who's bionic arms are also high explosive charges. > >Thrust 4, 63 126 Thus 64/ 128 > >FTL, 32 64 > >Partial Streamlining, 32 64 Which accounts for the higher price. +3 for hull, + 6 for SMP's and +2 for the extra FTL capability. > >Weapons A typo. F, FP, FS. This and the SMP's are representing the rather incoherent use of missile systems the Yamato displays. > > 1x 3 Arc 2 Battery F,FP,FS. 2 6 TMF 100 > >Thrust 4, 20 40 > TOTAL 100 239 + 100 = 339 I was counting Armour As Mass x3 for some reason. > >CM I know but given the way this ship was designed it is a good argument for such. What loonie put a giant fin in front of one of the turrets. [Obviously the same one who thought the Mogami should have the thin fins in front of thier weapons.] I am suitably chastised and will include TMF in future.