From: Mark & Staci Drake <markandstaci@c...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:37:49 -0600
Subject: Thanks for answers....
Thanks for the answers to my questions on the beta fighter rules---now can anyone tell me what PSB means?? MD
Thanks for answers....
From: Flak Magnet <flakmagnet@t...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:40:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Thanks for answers....
Psuedo-Scientific Bul... erm... Background. Yah, that's it. BACKGROUND. --Tim > On Monday 08 March 2004 09:37 pm, Mark & Staci Drake wrote:
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:48:48 -0600
Subject: Re: Thanks for answers....
PSB is defined in the first Full Thrust Second Edition. Course, right now, I can't be sure about the spelling, but it's close to 'Psuedo-Science B******t'. As in if you can't defend with real science, baffle them with b... I'm curious: would there actually be anyone on this list who'd be offended by it being spelt out? Admittedly, I won't; archives, you know. Be a good time for timid lurkers to speak up. The_Beast
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:54:57 -0500
Subject: Re: Thanks for answers....
> PSB is defined in the first Full Thrust Second Edition. Pseudo-Scientific Baloney, or Plausible-Sounding Blarney > I'm curious: would there actually be anyone on this list who'd be Yes.
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:39:11 -0600
Subject: Re: Thanks for answers....
I think it is another drop in the rain of coarsening culture but would _I_ be offended? I wish I was so pure... but I agree with Laserlight that some might be and much as I hate to sound even vaguely PC (I Have to do some.... no. lots... of that at work and I still have dodged the unintentional provoked EEO charges several times by sheer luck) it is best left to the 'alternate meanings' or "***"'ed. On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:54:57 -0500 Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net> writes: > PSB is defined in the first Full Thrust Second Edition.
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:41:20 -0600
Subject: Re: Thanks for answers....
OOOh, is there a bounty on lurkers now??? I have been upset ever since Crows became 'protected' - not that I ever shot one (really) but the idea that they are protected.... Why not protect rabid dogs while you are at it? There, that might flush some for The Beast.... LOL! Gracias, Glenn On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:04:24 -0600 Doug Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> writes: > Well, that was disappointing; I was so hopeing to lure a few of the
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:49:51 -0600
Subject: Re: Thanks for answers....
> On 8 Mar 2004 at 20:48, Doug Evans wrote: > I'm curious: would there actually be anyone on this list who'd be It wouldn't offend me. After all, I pretty much "say it" in my head when I read it, so the fact that it isn't spelled out isn't doing much...