SV: SPOILER<<STARSHIP TROOPERS REVIEW>>

I did NOT write this. As a matter of fact I have no hangups at all about the
coed bit in the movie.

> Mike Wikan wrote:

> > >

> > > also directed the equal poor "Showgirls."

Please - can we get back to the relevent bits...

FT anyone?

-Michael

In a message dated 97-11-07 11:48:45 EST, you write:
<< Please - can we get back to the relevent bits...
FT anyone?
 -Michael
> [quoted text omitted]
I'm usually much more of a lurker than a poster. I usually don't have a lot of
time to participate in the list fully. I did wish to comment on Michael
Hodgson’s post. I think that as long as the debates don't get too far off
topic let the conversations and observations flow. In this particular case the
movie and discussions about it and related topics seem pretty close to source
material for FT/DS/SG. Most postings to the mailing list have something
to do with a topic of interest to the members and in some way related to the
mailing list’s subject. If there is a thread I'm not interested in following I
just delete those posts. I feel most of the regulars on the list are
interesting people and I've learned quite a bit from them. I don't agree with
all their opinions but I usually enjoy reading the posts and when it gets
uninteresting there is always the delete button. I trust that the powers that
be in control of the mailing list will step in if things get out of control.
Michael please don’t take this as any kind of personal attack I just wanted to
go on record as being against limits.