From: dadams@p...
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 18:05:37 +1000
Subject: Stealth1
> [quoted text omitted] Contrary to DS2, my opinion is that stealth is advanced manufacturing, packing more things into less space, and so ending up with a smaller vehicle size. This is working backwards from stealth's game effects. <<< I actually like the idea of active stealth, where radar gets smothered by counter signals. (Good example is those headphones that cancel sounds). Darryl
From: Andrew Martin <Al.Bri@x...>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 09:51:02 +1300
Subject: Re: Stealth1
> Darryl wrote: For that kind of thing, I've got ECM, Jammers and Direction Finders rules on my site.
From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 09:27:22 PST
Subject: Re: Stealth1
I was under the impression it was a combination of both active and passive stealth systems - lower slung designs, eyeball and sensor-baffling paint schemes, stealthy materials in construction, and active jamming and spoofing measures built into the vehicle. None of the above would be sufficient, it's the combined package that counts, that's what (at least it seems to me) the stealth levels are about. Brian B ----Original Message Follows---- From: dadams@parracity.nsw.gov.au Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Stealth1 Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 18:05:37 +1000 > [quoted text omitted] Contrary to DS2, my opinion is that stealth is advanced manufacturing, packing more things into less space, and so ending up with a smaller vehicle size. This is working backwards from stealth's game effects. <<< I actually like the idea of active stealth, where radar gets smothered by counter signals. (Good example is those headphones that cancel sounds). Darryl