St. Jon^3 of Needham

4 posts ยท Jan 15 2002 to Jan 15 2002

From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:33:27 -0500

Subject: St. Jon^3 of Needham

[Tomb]

> St^3 Tuffley of Needham - John T. (The guy who wrote all these neat

[Laserlight]

Nope, that was my doing, once for FT, once for DS, once for SG--but I
was provoked.

[Tomb]

Okay, the comment is noted and the attribution accorded. The logic even makes
sense. If your argument is PSB, its pretty coherent.

OTOH, are you sure you were PROvoked and not INvoked? I've wondered about you
for some time now.... infernal puns.... devilish humor... etc.

From: Jerry Han <jhan@w...>

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:46:57 -0500

Subject: Re: St. Jon^3 of Needham

> Tomb wrote:

I certainly didn't say anything about Jon's angelic nature. I just
try and keep the archives up to date.  (8-)  (Usually failing miserably,
these days.  (8-( )

JGH

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:55:30 -0500

Subject: RE: St. Jon^3 of Needham

[Tomb]
> are you sure you were PROvoked and not INvoked? I've wondered

Why are you worried? You already said you won't sell me your soul.
Although, come to think of it, you didn't say anything about long-term
lease with option to renew....

> Okay, the comment is noted and the attribution accorded. The logic even

From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:09:03 -0800

Subject: RE: St. Jon^3 of Needham

> laserlight Wrote:

> >are you sure you were PROvoked and not INvoked? I've wondered
etc.
> Why are you worried? You already said you won't sell me your soul.

Which brings us back to point one, and the Narns.....