Space crews and solar flares. was Re: Space carrier fighter p hilosphyRe: ADLER TAG AAR

3 posts ยท Oct 23 1998 to Oct 23 1998

From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:01:28 +1000

Subject: RE: Space crews and solar flares. was Re: Space carrier fighter p hilosphyRe: ADLER TAG AAR

I think Paul O'Grady may be able to add some confirmation to this story (after
all he is a RAN Officer and knows crews off the vessel in question). As Paul
described it to me it was on an excercise at sea (not in harbour) that teh
subamrine was able to 'sneak' into the centre of the 'enemy' fleet.

SNIP
> prop. Sometimes old tech is and advantage. One of the Australian

This is, umm, how should I say, an "urban legend". If you've ever spent any
time around any harbor then you know no skipper would ever undertake such an
iresponsible hazordous activity in shallow waters in anything but the most
dire of consequences. Most of the harbor where the sub base lies is in less
than 30 feet of water except for a few channels. He would have been cashiered
by the Australian Navy at the least for trying such a thing. The run in to
Puguet sound is very heavily trafficed by all manner of ships and subs don't
even submerge until they're a half a day out or longer. Even at Groton, Subs
don't submerge until they're almost a day out and off the continental shelf.

Regardless, it is true that diesel boats are ingherently quieter than nukes.
My original comment was a JOKE.

Los <g>

From: Los <los@c...>

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:26:12 -0400

Subject: Re: Space crews and solar flares. was Re: Space carrier fighter p hilosphyRe: ADLER TAG AAR

Ahh that is an entirely different (And plausible) scenario.

Los

> Glover, Owen wrote:

> I think Paul O'Grady may be able to add some confirmation to this
fleet.
> SNIP

From: Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@i...>

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 10:09:37 -0400

Subject: Re: Space crews and solar flares. was Re: Space carrier fighter p hilosphyRe: ADLER TAG AAR

I heard this same story a number of years ago as told by a friend in the
Canadian Navy, except that it was one of the old Canadian
diesel-electric
subs and it snuck into the USS America carrier battlegroup to sink the big
one...

I wonder if the whole thing isn't an urban legend / myth created by we
countries with wee navies to poke fun at the Americans...   Maybe it was
the Swedes - they are supposed to be deploying some of the most advanced
submarine technology around (subs without conning tower using chemical fuel
cell power systems for extend underwater operations, etc etc)

On the other hand - countries like Britain and the US rely on their
smaller
allies like Canada and Australia to help them with realistic training -
we have conventional subs and they don't, and the Russians are furiously
selling off ex-Soviet navy equipment (like conventional subs, etc - hey
they sold nuke attack subs to Iran) to countries the US might have to tango
with... We get to simulate the bad guys, and these training exercises are
going on all the time. Maybe it actually happened as described for both the
Can. and Aus. subs?

> At 12:26 AM 10/23/98 -0400, you wrote:
fleet.
> SNIP