Soviet tanks and missiles

2 posts ยท Sep 2 2002 to Sep 2 2002

From: Scott Siebold <gamers@a...>

Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:42:50 -0500

Subject: Re: Soviet tanks and missiles

> Well, the US used to have one, the M60A2 ,which fired a Shillaleagh

> ATGMs through more normal-sized guns (115mm and 125mm calibers) which
and
> so did the tendency of the 152mm rounds to break and spill propellant
There was also a big problem with the Shillelagh system. The gun could fire
acurately out to about 600 meters and the missle was inacurate out till about
1000 meters. This left a dead zone of about 400 meters.

I also was talking to a tanker who had been a crewman on the Sheriden tank who
said that if they fired the gun the recoil messed up the optics and caused
problems if they switched back to missles. I assume that this was not a
problem on the Shillelagh system mounted on

the M60 tank (a heavier tank and why add it to the M60 if the problem was
found in Sheriden).

From: Robert W. Eldridge <bob_eldridge@m...>

Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:13:24 -0400

Subject: Re: Soviet tanks and missiles

Nope, M60A2's also had the problem, although not quite as frequently. The IR
guidance for the Shillelagh was just VERY finicky.
[quoted original message omitted]