Sniper and stuff <was[DS and SG] Regiments of the Crown>

2 posts ยท Oct 26 1998 to Oct 26 1998

From: Los <los@c...>

Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 22:52:01 -0500

Subject: Sniper and stuff <was[DS and SG] Regiments of the Crown>

> John M. Atkinson wrote:

> Thomas Barclay wrote:

OK, I only know two actual snipers from Vietnam, one Marine one Army. (One was
my team sergeant for many years) Both were already one their second (the
Marine on his third) tour befor ethey became snipers. It true that there was
no formal Sniper training back then like there is now, but units ran their own
courses in country which in some ways was even better because you are learning
from guys fresh from the bush IN the environment you will be operating in. As
Tom says snipers were not tasked on a "hey you" type of basis. Usually you had
to be a seasoned, mature, infantryman who waw also a damn good shot before
even trying out for the job. So your average sniper was already a dead shot
with his standard rifle before even getting tasked as a sniper. While the
standards for sniper training were uneven from unit to unit and service to
service, the snipers were on a whole, a cut well above others. BTW, my team
sgt had one kill out at 1100 yards, with his
remington 700 (he was the Marine) the army guy used the M14/21).

Sniper porgrams nowadays are pretty long (4 weeks to 8 weeks depending on
whether its'a line sniper course of you are going to SOTIC (Special Operations
Target Inderiction Course). In the US Army, you're not going to get into the
course unless you already are a dead shot (39 or 40 out of 40 on the standard
army marksmanship test), so guys going into the course already bring their
skill with them. It's in no way a "hey you" thing. Most of the training
focusses on actaul marksmanship and some fieldcraft (though the second skill
is probably more important than the first)

Snipers in line battalions have two equally importnat roles, target
interdiction and reconnasaince and surveillance. You don't join up as a sniper
you are sent by your parent unit. It's a big investment in time and resources.
You have to take some of the best guys in your unit and send them
away for training. (think of this in SG/DS terms if youa re stationed
God knows where with your regt. So you lose them for the trip out and back
plus the course). I think it's importnat to have snipers at the battalion
level (usualy a squad with maybe threeor four two man teams that you can farm
out to teh companies or work independnetly.)

But still, I wouln't go overboard on snipers. (like a platoon per bn) They
don't have a significant impact on the actual battle, they can at time score
the big hit, Their influence in a heads up battle is usually "incidental" to
the main course. There's a cost analysis thing you have to do. The cost in
training them vs their impact in a big fight. Go for a few high quality guys
and keep the rest of your pepole with the line units where they can make a
difference.

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 09:46:25 -0800

Subject: Re: Sniper and stuff <was[DS and SG] Regiments of the Crown>

> Los wrote:

> Snipers in line battalions have two equally importnat roles, target

> But still, I wouln't go overboard on snipers. (like a platoon per bn)
They
> don't have a significant impact on the actual battle, they can at time

Hrm... sounds like they share a sort of role with the rest of their recon
platoon.

In my mech units, the recon platoon is 6x4 man teams carried in CFVs. I havn't
really put together my light organizations (light infantry wasn't a specialty
of the Roman Empire) but it will probably be roughly the
same.  Perhaps one 4-man team is really two sniper/spotter teams.