Ship designs

4 posts ยท Feb 11 2002 to Feb 12 2002

From: MSN Renegade <msnrenegade@c...>

Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:01:27 -0000

Subject: RE: Ship designs

From: ~ On Behalf Of Brian Bilderback
Sent: 11 February 2002 20:43
Subject: FT: Ship designs

> I was considering a new class of ship, the Destroyer

Every effort I've tried along these lines has been a double failure. Leaders
for fighter or corvette formations tend to get smoked, and dedicated ADFC
boats designed to hang behind capital ships also can't
shoot down enough fighters to be cost-effective.

I came to the conclusion that ADFC was either overpriced or overmass, but many
of my experiments were with the earlier ADAF system from FT2. Given the way
ADFC works and is priced, it only makes sense to put it on the largest ships
possible.

From: Eric Foley <stiltman@t...>

Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:56:15 -0800

Subject: Re: Ship designs

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Brian Bell <bkb@b...>

Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:18:46 -0500

Subject: RE: Ship designs

You can try my Ship Designer at http://www.ftsr.org/ft/ft25/submit.html

You must be running IE on a Windows platform, however (uses vbscript).

---
Brian Bell bbell1@insight.rr.com <mailto:bbell1@insight.rr.com> ICQ: 12848051
AIM: Rlyehable YIM: Rlyehable Cygnus X1.info
http://www.cygnusx1.info/
---

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>

Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:54:31 -0800

Subject: RE: Ship designs

Thanks!

2B^2

> From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
It
> would be in the same mass range as the DD or CL, and would sacrifice