shermans versus panthers

2 posts ยท Jan 7 2001 to Jan 7 2001

From: Barclay, Tom <tomb@b...>

Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:01:20 -0500

Subject: shermans versus panthers

Allan said: There is something no one has really mentioned yet. One of the
primary reasons the Germans did so poorly in the West was something fairly
new: tactical air support. When the weather was clear, the Germans could not
easily move their forces without Allied aircraft attacking them with impunity.

[Tomb] Not quite true. I mentioned that in the original post! *LOL!*

And he went on to say:

No, you're not a victim of urban legends. Your reading matches mine.

In general, the Soviet vehicles were very good and far superior to that
available to the Western allies. The T34/85 was a good, even superior,
match
for a Panther.  The T34/76 came out in 1941, almost 2 years before the
Panther, and was quite a shock to the Germans (and easily superior to every
German tank at the time). The T34/76 suffered from an inferior gun and
thinner armour than the Panther. However its armour was well sloped and it was
fairly reliable, mechanically. It was better than the Panzer IV (the Germans'
most plentiful tank) and far better than the Panzer III.

[Tomb] The T-34 is undoubtedly better than the Panzer III. I wouldn't
say it was (except perhaps on a mechanical robustness level) hugely better
than a
Pz IV. The T-34/76 was I beleive the tank that russian tank commanders
were
prepared to exchange 3-1 with Panthers. The T-34/85 could kill a Panther
one on one.

[Tomb] The problem with the soviet forces included: 1) an early shortage
of good officers (having shot them all), 2) a shortage of good tactics (until
later in the war, when they perhaps had an army an air force that could have
kicked America out of Europe if they hadn't been afraid of the bomb), 3) a
shortage of comms, 4) some rigidity in their command structure, 5) early on,
inexperienced crews that used their vehicles poorly and bailed out to easily.
Thus the German stats look more impressive than they were. German engineering
was good, but it was often maintenance intensive and poorly suited to Russian
winters. Eventually, when the Russians had bled enough and spent the time to
develop experienced officers and tactics and had built good tanks and planes
in profusion, things didn't look anywhere near as nice from the German
PoV.....

The T34, in all versions,  was lighter than the Panther -- by about half
in
the case of the T34/76 -- which helped with ground pressure. The T34/85
was, according to my Jane's book, considered the best tank of the war by the
Germans.

[Tomb] I wouldn't doubt it. Similar to why the germans had a fondness
for
the PPSh-41 over the MP-40. Robust, reliable, and very effective _in the
hands of a good commander_.

 The T34/85 was STILL being used as a frontline tank in Africa into
the 1980s.

[Tomb] I'm sure rifles from 1900 were still in use with some forces too.
When you don't have to cope with lots of TOW, Hellfire, etc, then you can
really get by with older technology armourwise....

The Germans used as many captured T34s as they could get, though logistics was
a big reason for this.

From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>

Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 15:43:11 -0500

Subject: Re: shermans versus panthers

On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:01:20 -0500 , "Barclay, Tom" <tomb@bitheads.com>
wrote:

> [Tomb] Not quite true. I mentioned that in the original post! *LOL!*

*checks history* D'oh!

> [Tomb] The T-34 is undoubtedly better than the Panzer III. I wouldn't

The T-34/76 wasn't hugely better than the Pz IV, no. But the stats I
have suggest it was better. It had comparable armour thickness, with better
sloping. It weighed about the same, but was much faster (55 km/h road
speed
versus 38 km/h for the Pz IV). It had a greater operational range.
Fording distance, vertical obstacle crossing, and trench crossing were all
superior. I would have to dig up data to find out how the guns compared,
though, and in
that the T34/76 may have been inferior.

> [Tomb] I'm sure rifles from 1900 were still in use with some forces

Oh, very true. I think, though, that it is a testament to the vehicle that it
is robust enough to survive use anywhere into the 80s.

If I'm not mistaken, I think some places are still using T34 chassis for
mounting other weapons, such as AA.

> [Tomb] Soviets also used salvaged German tanks. Both sides salvaged

True. The Western Allies also captured weapons, but mostly to test their
capabilities. They weren't lacking for tanks of their own, that's for sure.
The American production capability during the war was truly amazing. I
remember in my university WW2 class reading about ship production. At the
start of the war the US had, what, 4 carriers? By the end of the war they had
something like 140-odd carriers of all sizes and classes, and a number
being built that they ended up scrapping or converting. (Canada was no slouch
either, having the 3rd largest navy by war's end, even if it was destroyer
heavy...).