[SG2] Found a GAC/1 vs. Gauss SAW Bug...

3 posts ยท Nov 28 1998 to Nov 29 1998

From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>

Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 01:05:36 GMT

Subject: [SG2] Found a GAC/1 vs. Gauss SAW Bug...

I noticed a strange discrepancy with regards to the GAC/1 and the Gauss
SAW. The Gauss SAW rolls Quality die and Firepower die (D10) against a range
die.
The GAC/1 rolls a Quality die and a Firecon die (D6 to D10) against a
range
die. Because the GAC/1 is a class 1 weapon, it's range die is the same
as the Gauss SAW. This means that if you mount a Gauss automatic weapon on a
vehicle, it becomes LESS effective. This in spite of the fact that
realistically it should be higher off the ground (thus gaining a range
advantage) and should be more stable (it's mounted, versus sitting on the
ground). This is an artifact of the SG2 system. Weapons fire with a Firecon
die, not a Firecon die.
Essentially, a vehicle needs superior Firecon to fire a GAC/1 as good as
a squad.

As far as I know, this is the only weapon (got to check, though) that is used
as a SAW and a vehicle weapon with essentially no changes. That is, the impact
is the same either way: D12 for the Gauss SAW, and D12 x 1 for the
GAC/1.

Not sure if this is a problem or not. I'd be tempted to allow a house rule,
though, that a GAC/1 fires with a Firecon of D10 all the time when
mounted on
a vehicle. This makes it identical to the SAW. Otherwise the GAC/1
becomes less effective on a vehicle...

Funny enough, though, the vehicle design rules allow a SAW to be mounted on a
vehicle for 1 capacity point with 360 degree arc of fire (granted, on a pintel
mount), while a GAC/1 mounted on a vehicle with a turret requires 3
capacity points.

Another house rule could fix this: Gauss SAWs can not be mounted on vehicles
(you HAVE to use the GAC/1...).

Comments?

From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>

Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 09:47:21 +1000

Subject: RE: [SG2] Found a GAC/1 vs. Gauss SAW Bug...

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>

Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 02:19:08 GMT

Subject: Re: [SG2] Found a GAC/1 vs. Gauss SAW Bug...

On Sun, 29 Nov 1998 09:47:21 +1000, "Glover, Owen"
<oglover@mov.vic.gov.au> wrote:

> But only if you intend to use it primarily for engaging infantry. A

Hmmm... That's right, actually...

> Then there

Oops... you're right. Misread an asterisk. You are right, the GAC/1 does
do D12 x 2 damage to a point target on a major hit, while the Gauss SAW only
does
D12...

I thought there was an asterisk beside the Gauss SAW but in fact it's on the
Plasma Gun below it.

> Strikes me that there are generally two predominant vehicle design

Yep. I agree, now that I see that I goofed. Thanks, Owen, for clearing that
up.

Should just about kill THIS thread... *S*