> > What is the interest of switch off and EW unit ?
Logically, if a EW unit is on and ready to interfere with communications, it
could be located immediately by an enemy using Direction Finders and targetted
with artillery, without requiring a soldier on the ground to eyeball the
target. Presumably a EW unit that is in passive mode ("switched off") could be
used to locate a EW unit that is active ("switched on").
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:49:48 +1300, "Andrew Martin" <Al.Bri@xtra.co.nz>
wrote:
> Logically, if a EW unit is on and ready to interfere with
That's not what the rules state, but a number of us suggested that an active
EW unit could be spotted more easily. The question is how do you do this?
I'm assuming the passive unit would use up an action. What would the mechanic
be for spotting? I would suggest using the same mechanic for an active EW unit
spotting any hidden unit, except it doesn't use an EW chit (obviously, it's
passive). In other words, it's the quality die of the passive EW unit against
a die for the active EW unit. The active EW unit's die is as mentioned on page
52 under "remote spotting of Inverted Counters".
This is a good house rule, actually.
Allan Goodall awg@sympatico.ca
Goodall's Grotto: http://www.vex.net/~agoodall
"Surprisingly, when you throw two naked women with sex toys into a living room
full of drunken men, things
always go bad." - Kyle Baker, "You Are Here"
From - Wed Jan 03 11:05:19 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA14344;
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:06:53 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBRNjxk99247;
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 27 Dec
2000 15:45:58 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBRNjv899226
for gzg-l-outgoing; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:45:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:KK8BDGDq0JDFmRa/qGZOdXytysJ2b9aR@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBRNjtH99221
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:45:55
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp6.quixnet.net (psmtp6.array3.laserlink.net
[63.65.123.56] (may be forged))
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBRNjtp35399
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:45:55 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from laserlight@quixnet.net)
Received: from pavilion (1Cust150.tnt18.princess-anne.va.da.uu.net
[63.31.7.150])
by smtp6.quixnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA17144
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:45:53 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <001e01c07078$2292b400$96071f3f@pavilion>
From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@quixnet.net>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <200012272115.NAA15402@mail1.bigmailbox.com>
<01c001c0704c$5d4062e0$0d44ae3e@default>
<000701c07059$70c78ca0$1e0aa8c0@hqmknt04enu>
<026301c0705d$00427a40$0d44ae3e@default>
Subject: Re: help please (Dirtside).. I found it..
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:44:41 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000a92
I said:
> > Don't have my rules here and I'm not a DS2 guru but I think you'll
Bob replied:
> Thanks for the response Chris but its not that.. There are no
Well, that turns out not to be the case. Page 19, right col, about
2/3 down the page, says that an active ADS has no effective ECM, no
stealth, and its (basic) signature is increased by one.
(I didn't see that "cannot fire at ground targets" bit (not that I looked very
hard). Pg 31 says you can't fire at targets *other than* ground targets
without your ADS lit.)