From: Brian Bell <bkb@b...>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:30:41 GMT
Subject: RE: [SG] Mech Cavalry
hank you both for the feedback. I had thought that the vehicle would becove a fire-magnet, and thus, negate some of the advantage of going 'In Possition' behind it. I will accept your wisdom and remove the paragraph (or adapt it to allow a dismounted MechCav to go 'In Possition' in the open. I should also add a paragraph that Mechanized Cavalry Vehicles (MCV) are treated as Armor 0, open top vehicles for purposes of fire targeted specifically against the vehicle. Any other comments? Is there other areas that I did not address, that should be addressed? ----- Brian Bell bkb@beol.net http://www.ftsr.org/sg2/ ----- PS. I appologize if this is duplicated. My first post appears to have gotten lost. [quoted original message omitted]