[SG] EW

6 posts ยท Jan 1 2002 to Jan 1 2002

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 12:56:32 -0800 (PST)

Subject: [SG] EW

Has it occoured to anyone else that a recon/cavalry
platoon ought to have an EW Tech per squad? I mean, they operate dispersed
quite frequently. EW remote spotting would be a lifesaver, and jamming enemy
commo and sensors would be the best way to ensure that a compromised scout
team lives to get back to report.

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:17:51 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: [SG] EW

> On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, John Atkinson wrote:

> Has it occoured to anyone else that a recon/cavalry

Which is why my Ghurka's have an integral EW operator in the platoon. They
normally operate with ALL electronics switched off. But when the shit does
start hitting the fan, they need all the EW they can get.

Cheers,

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:40:06 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: [SG] EW

> --- Derk Groeneveld <derk@cistron.nl> wrote:

> Which is why my Ghurka's have an integral EW

I'm in the midst of a full revision of all my
infantry/cavalry/recon/engineer/MP/Special Forces
platoons (so far, 14 of the 20 or so different
platoons--should be done with everyone but the MPs by
the end of the day). One of the reforms I'm instituting is EW in every
infantry platoon. We don't
operate with all electronics switched off--our plan is
to give our enemy's children birth defects from ionized chromosomes.:)

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:49:12 -0500

Subject: Re: [SG] EW

JohnA said:
> Has it occoured to anyone else that a recon/cavalry

Having the EW tech make sure the report gets through would be more important.

(Disagree? Then why send the guys out in the first place?)

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:50:41 -0500

Subject: Re: [SG] EW

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@yahoo.com>
> I'm in the midst of a full revision of all my

for higher echelons you may find this useful:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/army/unit/toe/

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:34:21 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: [SG] EW

> --- Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:

Actually, Da. Thanks.