SG - Confidence Levels

4 posts ยท Jul 6 1997 to Jul 9 1997

From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>

Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 19:42:46 -0400

Subject: SG - Confidence Levels

I think we've been playing Cl checks a little wrong; we do teh CL check with
the highest or worst factor at the time of a given check requirement.

Here's an example:

A squad of infantry come under effective fire and take casualties, one of
which is the leader. This is also the first time suppressed. Assume
the squad has a MM of Medium, the factors are First time Suppressed - 1,
Unit Takes Casualties - 1 and Leader A Casualty - 3. The CL we play with
is LV plus just the worst ie 3 for the leader. So should we use LV plus
ALL factors ie 1+1+3?

Any clarifiacations would be much appreciated.

From: Barry Cadwgan <bcadwgan@f...>

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 03:17:59 -0400

Subject: Re: SG - Confidence Levels

> Glover, Owen wrote:

I've always assumed it was one confidence check for each circumstance that
applies..

From: jrmintz@j...

Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:31:21 -0400

Subject: Re: SG - Confidence Levels

> Glover, Owen wrote:
No, you've been doing it right. The rules are pretty clear on that. Choose the
highest factor that is merely a number. And factors that have
are in the form of +X add to your base number.  So if you are shot and
suppressed for the first time, two line troopers die, and your squad leader
bites it, you only test for the squad leader dying since it is the highest
number. It seems kinda odd to me as well.

-Bite The Wax Tadpole-

From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>

Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 00:16:32 -0400

Subject: RE: SG - Confidence Levels

Well thanks for those that have responded so far (Daric Morris and Barry
Cadwgan), two similar but opposing views?! I think I'll continue playing the
worst factor for the time being.

> ----------