From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:32:11 -0400
Subject: [SG] Adrian's Medics
> Adrian wrote: Your medic unit (the 2 troopers) have to move to within unit coherency of the unit with injured troopers, or that unit has to move within unit coherency of the medics. The actual reorg action has to be spent by the unit with the wounded, but if a medic team is within coherency, their bonus gets added. In effect, they join the unit very briefly, just for the purposes of that check. Then, they can both go their separate ways. The medic team CAN'T take the reorganize action on behalf of the larger unit. [Tomb] Why not? I'd only let it treat the wounded (not do other re-org stuff). Our medics seemed willing to be treating wounded while the rest of us were fighting! [Tomb] And why isn't this up on House Rules at www.stargrunt.ca? I hear if you submit it, they'll get it up pretty quick. The webmaster especially is supposed to be pretty quick. :-P [Tomb] And more generally, this plus some other thinking the other day brought up a point: Do modern medics travel armed? Does the Geneva Convention not restrict the arms medics may bear? (It does IIRC restrict the role they can play). And if there is a weapons stricture, is it followed in standard infantry formations and in spec ops formations? (In our infantry unit, I don't recall the medics being armed for the excercises, but there weren't many of them so I may misrecall).