Hi, I'm considering doing SG2 in 15mm and was wondering: Are most folks who do
15mm using cm in place of inches (as recommended in the rules) or are you
remaining in inches? I think the smaller figures with bigger movement might
give the game a more sweeping feel but am curious what others have chosen and
why.
I'm sure this has probably come up before but the note on how to search the
Memory Bank isn't there anymore.
I still use inches with my 15mm figures.
---
Brian Bell bbell1@insight.rr.com ICQ: 12848051 AIM: Rlyehable YIM: Rlyehable
Cygnus X1.info
http://www.cygnusx1.info/
---
[quoted original message omitted]
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:54:22 -0400, MxConnell@aol.com wrote:
> I'm considering doing SG2 in 15mm and was wondering: Are most folks
I still use inches. You could use centimetres, but you'd end up with your
figures clumped together about as much as you would using inches and 28mm
figures. It's workable, but a pain.
If you played with 10mm figures, you could use centimetres. I have thought of
that, due to a lack of playing space right now (of course, the counters take
up a whole lot of room).
MxConnell@aol.com schrieb:
> Hi,
Given that SG's scale is 1 Inch (on the table) equals 10 m (Real Life) or
1:400, both figure sizes are vastly overscale anyway. Play what you like and
fits on your table.
6 mm would be roughly the proper figure size for SG ;-)
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:41:42 +0200 (CEST) KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de
writes:
> MxConnell@aol.com schrieb:
There you go baiting laserlight again; 6mm (God's own scale) for SG2 - I
may have to buy the rules....
Gracias,
From: <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de>
> Given that SG's scale is 1 Inch (on the table) equals 10 m (Real Life)