From: Noah Doyle <nvdoyle@m...>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:19:02 -0500
Subject: RE: Savasku Questions
BTW, do people use the standard mavement rules with the S, or do they use the 'cinematic' rules? (AKA 'gravimetric' movement - I figure the big spines are used to grab a hold of space and tug...)
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 20:45:51 -0700
Subject: Re: Savasku Questions
> Noah Doyle wrote: We are in the FT2 space 'round here. Bye for now,
From: Noah Doyle <nvdoyle@m...>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 23:55:15 -0500
Subject: RE: Savasku Questions
By standard, I meant 'vector' - wow, this is my day for mis-statement, huh? Rhetorical question, please:) But what the heck are those big spines for? I could see some sort of wierd movement (spacial grab & thrust), or maybe sensors, like a big passive array. Here's an odd idea - S passive sensors are as good as everybody else's actives - they don't even use actives - hard to find, and quiet. Noah [quoted original message omitted]
From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 15:11:20 +1000
Subject: RE: Savasku Questions
> Noah Doyle wrote: Western Suburbs we use Cinematic.
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 08:45:42 +0100
Subject: Re: Savasku Questions
> Noah Doyle wrote: "Cinematic" movement IS the standard FT2 movement system; it is the Vector system that is the new optional add-on. We have no plans at present to make Vector movement the new "standard" system.
From: Noah Doyle <nvdoyle@m...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 11:15:08 -0500
Subject: RE: Savasku Questions
We just latched onto it so quickly, that it became standard around here nearly immediately. Then again, EFSB is pretty big amongst my group as well. So, I'll stick to 'Vector' & 'Cinema' for better differentiation. Noah [quoted original message omitted]