Reviresco n' DSII, n' Netiquette

3 posts ยท Oct 3 1997 to Oct 6 1997

From: George,Eugene M <Eugene.M.George@k...>

Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 10:08:04 -0700

Subject: Reviresco n' DSII, n' Netiquette

Status: RO

Well, that aside. I can say that my dealings with Mr.McEwan have been pleasant
and prompt. The worst things I can say about Reviresco are that
the 25mm line of "Stargrunt-worthy" minis for his Starguard game are
crude and small. But, they are cheap, and the really alien minis (I like
the insect-aliens and the squid guys.) aren't too bad. The 1/300 stuff
is OK, plain and inexpensive. Some of the 25mm vehicles are OK (try the Gauss
Cannon for SGII for those towed arty pieces.). Starguard is a throwback to the
"gilded tin age" of 70's gaming and is overpriced for the three hole punched
sheets and binder.

I wasn't around for the RGMM sharking or flaming and I daresay vote with your
wallets. But I'm satisfied and Reviresco stuff has made the grade for my TO&E.

Plus, has John McEwan been informed of his breach of nettiquette? Maybe it's
just enthusiastic stupidity.

0.02 From

Gene

> -----Original Message-----

From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>

Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 00:29:24 GMT

Subject: Re: Reviresco n' DSII, n' Netiquette

On Fri, 3 Oct 1997 10:08:04 -0700, "George,Eugene M"
> <Eugene.M.George@kp.ORG> wrote:

Status: RO

> Plus, has John McEwan been informed of his breach of nettiquette ?
Maybe
> it's just enthusiastic stupidity.

I suspect that was the case. He was informed at the time, as a couple of
people flamed him. He hasn't done it since, so I suppose he's learned his
lesson.

From: Phillip E. Pournelle <pepourne@n...>

Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 09:08:01

Subject: Re: Reviresco n' DSII, n' Netiquette

> At 12:29 AM 10/4/97 GMT, Allan Goodall wrote:
Status: RO

> Plus, has John McEwan been informed of his breach of nettiquette ?
Maybe
> it's just enthusiastic stupidity.

Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity...