RE-Starfire designs

2 posts ยท Jan 5 2001 to Jan 8 2001

From: Bif Smith <bif@b...>

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:39:41 -0000

Subject: RE-Starfire designs

I have one question-

Bug light cruisers? mass=40?? bit small? more like a DD to me.

I prefer woking to a mass of 60 (ish) for myself. Also, as Oerjan.Ohlson
pointed out, for a FT design for the CLE, try more PDS and no CL.1 bats, makes
a more interesting (if severly limited) design.

From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>

Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:44:11 +1100

Subject: RE: RE-Starfire designs

They may be a bit small, but it's necessary for the sense of scale. If they're
too big, they become too effective for a "throwaway" unit. For Allied ships to
be comparable they just require building using similar masses. It's not
necessary to be strict in the FT class interpretations. (look at Honor
Harrington; it's more of a log scale than a linear scale in the class
differences).

Neath Southern Skies -http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/
[Pirates] Dame Captain Washalot
[MKW2] Admiral Peter Rollins - Task Force Zulu-Beta
[Firestorm] Battletech PBeM GM

> -----Original Message-----