From: Stark, Luke <lcs@i...>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:45:55 -0500
Subject: RE: Question that may be really *old*...
Bridge simulator...interesting idea...almost cerainly not a first rev thing.
*wink*
> Before we go too far there is the matter of licensing.
That is something I'm treading carefully on. It's only been an hour or two
since I started this thread and three people have sent me email about
licensing. I do not want to screw anything up for any of us. Read my other
posts for more info. I wouldn't enjoy playing this game alone...
-L
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:44 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA18246;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:50:12 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5FkkS05323;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:46:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 07:46:45 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5FkiF05301
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:SW0FPDJ5yp02MmBlFmP2Soz0XFMsp9Vc@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5FkhP05296
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:46:43
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.quixnet.net (psmtp2.array3.laserlink.net
[63.65.123.52] (may be forged))
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5Fkgf06991
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:46:42 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET)
Received: from hqmknt04enu ([63.88.48.82])
by smtp2.quixnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA29120
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:46:41 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <003301c05ed2$a1fd0270$1e0aa8c0@hqmknt04enu>
From: "Chris DeBoe" <LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <200012050250.UAA22760@saluki-mailsmtp.siu.edu>
<vsmo2tgdbg9t29p470lsq1loaq6pqnkb74@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: But I already suggested... Re: GZG-NCC (was Re: Winter War
28)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:47:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000072c
> >What that's abowt is a prime example of the rich panoply that is the
Allan Goodall said:
> Actually, I hang out too much with Southerners. Mississippi,
I'm
> fixin to call them up and see how I'm doin'.
Y'all should be aware that it's Mi'sippi, Tenn'see, and Loosie-anna.
Although folks from round Knoxville speak MountnEEr rather than South'un.
At CanAm FMAS, you'll have the opportunity to meet a few of my troops,
including SGT Jedidiah ("Preacherman") Quesinberry and PFC Junior
("Chaw")
Martin. Should be interesting.
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:44 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA18664;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:52:42 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5FnC005458;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:49:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 07:49:11 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5FnA805437
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:8zeevgad9WEbCaPvOvbykqSaFCcSxm8Y@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5Fn9P05432
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:49:09
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.quixnet.net (psmtp4.array3.laserlink.net
[63.65.123.54] (may be forged))
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5Fn8f07373
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:49:08 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET)
Received: from hqmknt04enu ([63.88.48.82])
by smtp4.quixnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA06415
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:49:07 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <004b01c05ed2$f9076b50$1e0aa8c0@hqmknt04enu>
From: "Chris DeBoe" <LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <20001205004439.28332.qmail@web4602.mail.yahoo.com>
<4.3.2.7.0.20001204224118.00aad900@burgundavia@pop.crosswinds.net>
Subject: Re: Unofficial Official Lists?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:49:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000072d
Corey said:
> I would argue about the huge disparity between the NAC and the ESU. In
I'd go the other way. Keep the ESU at 8.5, make the NAC about 10. Otherwise
we're devaluing the FSE and NSL too much.
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:45 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA21071;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:03:24 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5G0Ek05678;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:00:13 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5G0Cv05657
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vex.cs.colorado.edu (vex.cs.Colorado.EDU
[128.138.241.27])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5G0BP05652
for <gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:00:11
-0800 (PST)
Received: (from seidl@localhost)
by vex.cs.colorado.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id eB5G05l10271
for gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:00:05
-0700 (MST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:domUdY8wjL9aF8tx0fzde6c/yJaMNRZg@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5FrPP05585
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:53:25
-0800 (PST)
Received: from sunlotion.arepa.com (mcmuffin.arepa.com [4.19.240.20])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id
eB5FrOf08033
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:53:24 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from lcs@intonet.com)
Received: from arepa.arepa.com by sunlotion.arepa.com via smtpd (for
soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.52]) with SMTP; 5 Dec 2000 15:53:24 UT
Received: from nt-exc1.arepa.com (nt-exc1.arepa.com [4.19.240.205])
by arepa.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24719
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:53:24 -0500
Received: by nt-exc1.arepa.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <YHA033YV>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:53:24 -0500
Message-ID: <F021B784A8C9D411A66F0002A52CA9360A50B8@nt-exc1.arepa.com>
From: "Stark, Luke" <lcs@intonet.com>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: FT: GZF format...anything use it?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:53:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000730
I haven't seen anythig new using the GZF format release in the last year (at
the Computer core at least) Am I mistaken?
How many people out there are actively using GZF in their own scripts? (perl
or whatever...)
Just wanting to know if GZF formats are widely used, or if it was a good idea
that didn't get much use (absolutely no offense to it's designers!)
-L
> -----Original Message-----
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:44 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA20953;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:02:12 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5G1fW05747;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:01:41 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5G1e205726
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:jerqH8o0ereOC504ef7LcKexm7bXA/tk@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5G1cP05721
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:01:38
-0800 (PST)
Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h002.c000.snv.cp.net
[209.228.32.66])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id
eB5G1cf09508
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:01:38 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from steve@pugh.net)
Received: (cpmta 1435 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2000 08:01:28 -0800
Received: from unknown (HELO stevep) (193.122.17.184)
by smtp.pugh.net (209.228.32.66) with SMTP; 5 Dec 2000 08:01:28 -0800
X-Sent: 5 Dec 2000 16:01:28 GMT
From: "Steve Pugh" <steve@pugh.net>
Organization: Do I look organised?
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:01:56 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: [FT] Can't access FT Computer Core
Message-ID: <3A2D1174.28272.175621E@localhost>
In-reply-to:
<35940AC31FFCD311AAF8009027D0D07D537B83@cambr-exch1.cambridge.adaptivebr
oadband.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de0000072f
> > > http://www.geocities.com/fullthrustweb/
Style.css exists. GeoCities servers are case sensitive so if the page links to
style.css or STYLE.CSS then it won't be found.
It's a really stupid bug in Netscape 4.x that causes it display a 404 error
when it can't get a linked stylesheet rather than displaying the page without
the styling, as common sense (and the relevant specifications) says should
happen.
I see that the reference to STYLE.CSS has been removed which should have
solved the problems.
For complex historical reasons, Netscape 4.x also uses JavaScript to parse CSS
which is why turning JS off solved the problem.
None of the above holds for Netscape 6 or for any non-Netscape
browsers.
Steve
--
The Ground Zero Games Meta-FAQ is available at
http://steve.pugh.net/grunt/meta-faq.txt
Steve Pugh <steve@pugh.net> <http://steve.pugh.net/>
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:45 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA21184;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:04:28 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5G3oo05963;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:03:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:03:50 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5G3mu05942
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:03:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:JUQqWtEYVtkDi4hEO7ZVMmmEo67IRTqC@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5G3lP05937
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:03:47
-0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.bcbsnd.com (pegasus.bcbsnd.com [199.253.134.233])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5G3jf09725
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:03:46 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from Dean.Gundberg@noridian.com)
Received: from [199.253.135.3] (helo=nus04359767) by pegasus.bcbsnd.com with
smtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
id 143KZ4-0000VB-00
for gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu; Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:03:34 -0600
From: "Dean Gundberg" <Dean.Gundberg@noridian.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: But I already suggested... Re: GZG-NCC (was Re: Winter War
28)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:02:25 -0600
Message-ID: <000a01c05ed4$c24874e0$b402140a@bcbsnd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200012050225.UAA06058@saluki-mailsmtp.siu.edu>
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000731
> Yuck, anything north of Fargo gives me the willies.
Fargo is a brisk -11F this morning (-20 and below is what I consider
cold though I did finally bring out the winter jacket today)
I could make a Winnepeg con but most gamers I know of are south of me, not
north. It all depends on when the con is and where. Would we want a dedicated
GZG con or would it be OK to attach the festivities to an existing con?
Dean Gundberg
Starship Combat News The latest information on Space Games and Miniatures
http://star_ranger.homestead.com/
star_ranger@my-deja.com
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:46 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22434;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:10:04 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5G8xb06092;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:08:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:08:58 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5G8v406071
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:uHaXckHIs6TUvhWEGmkeE4hM6pZpAbMP@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5G8tP06066
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:08:55
-0800 (PST)
Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h007.c000.snv.cp.net
[209.228.32.71])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id
eB5G8tf10387
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:08:55 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from steve@pugh.net)
Received: (cpmta 21885 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2000 08:08:49 -0800
Received: from unknown (HELO stevep) (193.122.17.184)
by smtp.pugh.net (209.228.32.71) with SMTP; 5 Dec 2000 08:08:49 -0800
X-Sent: 5 Dec 2000 16:08:49 GMT
From: "Steve Pugh" <steve@pugh.net>
Organization: Do I look organised?
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:09:17 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Sci-Fi Crossover after action report
Message-ID: <3A2D132D.18634.17C1E96@localhost>
In-reply-to: <20001130182718.25149.qmail@web4605.mail.yahoo.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000732
> Actually the movies show that the ties
When making RotJ he folks at ILM had a chart showing the relative
speeds/manoeuvrabilities of the various fighters. But they don't
distinguish between speed and manoeuvrability which is annoying but on a par
with the general quality of the science in SW.
See http://www.theforce.net/swtc/Pix/books/art/ilmmglt1.jpg
It rates TIEs, X-Wings and Y-Wings the same.
There's an interesting article about TIE fighters at
http://www.theforce.net/swtc/tie.html, indeed several of the SW
Technical Commentaries from that site are a good read.
I have some rough ideas for SW fighters in FT at
http://steve.pugh.net/grunt/sw_fighters.html
cheers,
Steve
--
The Ground Zero Games Meta-FAQ is available at
http://steve.pugh.net/grunt/meta-faq.txt
Steve Pugh <steve@pugh.net> <http://steve.pugh.net/>
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:46 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA24239;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:16:43 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5GGHS06689;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:16:16 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5GGFf06661
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:mktH+Ou7CxCO5EHNhjA6Spr8w7ePPKtx@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5GGDP06653
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:16:13
-0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange01.dscc.dla.mil (exchange01.dscc.dla.mil
[131.74.160.11])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5GGDf12044
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:16:13 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from Brian_Bell@dscc.dla.mil)
Received: by exchange01.dscc.dla.mil with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19)
id <W6J8NASJ>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:16:05 -0500
Message-ID:
<9DB05BB477A8D111AF3F00805F5730100D1006C5@exchange01.dscc.dla.mil>
From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: Unofficial Official Lists?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:15:57 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000733
The Unofficial GZG Fleet Rosters are "by no means complete". They show only
examples of fleet organization. When I did the PAU fleet lists, I subsumed
that there was overlap between the Task Forces. I.e. some elements of a Strike
Task Force would be drawn from Patrol or Escort Task Forces.
Also most of the PAU forces are escort forces for their commercial shipping. I
started under the assumption that the PAU forces broke down about (not
counting scouts):
CT/FF/DD: 40%
CL/CE: 40%
CH: 15% BC and above: 5%
Both the PAU and IF take to the stars in 2070. I would think that at this time
there was a major shake out of the African population. Many of those not of
Islam would be encouraged to take up residency on PAU colonies. Likewise,
those who did not want to be under an infidel government, would be encouraged
to migrate to an IF colony. But then again, I
read the GZG history to contain a mass off-Earth migration
for all countries between 2069 and 2200.
-----
Brian Bell bkb@beol.net
-----
> -----Original Message-----
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:46 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA29169;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:39:08 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5GbFB09546;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:37:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:37:13 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5GbBl09508
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:37:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vex.cs.colorado.edu (vex.cs.Colorado.EDU
[128.138.241.27])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5GbAP09492
for <gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:37:10
-0800 (PST)
Received: by vex.cs.colorado.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id eB5Gb4v10567
for gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:37:04
-0700 (MST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:is006IqQdntqaXeSliVrVrtMJjkbq1iy@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5GUeP08627
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:30:40
-0800 (PST)
Received: from okura.cowell.org (IDENT:root@okura.toysmakeuspowerful.com
[12.13.79.17])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5GUdf14928
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:30:39 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from andy@cowell.org)
Received: from cowell.org (IDENT:andy@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by okura.cowell.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19914
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:30:40 -0500
Message-Id: <200012051630.LAA19914@okura.cowell.org>
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Help finding modern army TO&E?
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:30:40 -0600
From: Andy Cowell <andy@cowell.org>
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000734
Anybody know of any examples on the net of any modern army (esp. US)
TO&E?
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:47 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA31507;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:49:18 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5Gmf809911;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:48:40 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5Gmd609890
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:N834uVD8m8AT3RfEDP6igAVR/k1lbPlo@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5GmbP09885
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:48:37
-0800 (PST)
Received: from proxy4.ba.best.com (root@proxy4.ba.best.com
[206.184.139.15])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5Gmbf18391
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:48:37 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from gregwong@best.com)
Received: from [205.149.168.159] (gregwong.vip.best.com
[205.149.168.159])
by proxy4.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id
IAA03891
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:47:51 -0800
(PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: gregwong@shell3.ba.best.com
Message-Id: <v04210100b652cc186e7d@[205.149.168.159]>
In-Reply-To: <3A2D1174.28272.175621E@localhost>
References: <3A2D1174.28272.175621E@localhost>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:46:23 -0800
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
From: Greg Wong <gregwong@best.com>
Subject: Re: [FT] Can't access FT Computer Core
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000735
Thanks to everyone for their help and understanding. I am now able to access
the Computer Core website with Netscape 4.7 with JavaScript and StyleSheets
enabled.
--Greg
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/fullthrustweb/
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:47 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA01253;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:59:39 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5Gx2J10144;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 08:59:01 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5Gx0410123
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:59:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:kINa+3V4N6plAohgzb9iLaSORrjUmnGM@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5GwwP10118
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:58:58
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.quixnet.net (psmtp4.array3.laserlink.net
[63.65.123.54] (may be forged))
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5Gwwf20282
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:58:58 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET)
Received: from hqmknt04enu ([63.88.48.82])
by smtp4.quixnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA09093
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:58:57 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <000701c05edc$ba8e5500$1e0aa8c0@hqmknt04enu>
From: "Chris DeBoe" <LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <F371gsVGDI0ve2DEc7B00001544@hotmail.com>
<4.2.2.20001205211928.00a1eee0@pop.hba.marine.csiro.au>
Subject: Re: [FT] Salvo Missile Range
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:59:27 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000736
Y'all use sensor rules? Does Derek use something like ash Shaulah's
refitted to escort config/missile catchers (mass 8, 1 hull, thrust 6, 1
ADFC, 3PDS)?
> Sorry Donald it just doesn't work that way. We only play vector and
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
> [quoted text omitted]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
> Elizabeth Fulton
From - Wed Dec 06 17:41:47 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA07163;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:22:33 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eB5HLsR10826;
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 5 Dec
2000 09:21:46 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB5HLjP10804
for gzg-l-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:ESZPxqltnojUEDovbqQSb75RqG7a9StN@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eB5HLhP10799
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:21:43
-0800 (PST)
Received: from exsrv.bitheads.com (mail.bitheads.com [64.26.142.194])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eB5HLgf25326
for <GZG-L@csua.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:21:42 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from tomb@bitheads.com)
Received: by host-253.bitheads.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2448.0)
id <X54KGVLX>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:21:36 -0500
Message-ID:
<417DEC289A05D4118408000102362E0A34D014@host-253.bitheads.com>
From: "Barclay, Tom" <tomb@bitheads.com>
To: "Gzg Digest (E-mail)" <GZG-L@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: [OT] Canadian peacekeepers
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:21:30 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000737
Sorry for the OT.... this one particularly might be of interest to Canadians
and Canadian expats.
For the listers from Canada, a friend just sent me this (the "they" is the
guys from "This Hour Has 22 Minutes" <-- Canuck comics for you other
non-Canadians on the list) and it seemed in the spirit of our list and
the yuletide season. Follow the link below to get mailing addresses or to go
to the bulletin board about half way down and send some messages to our
Canadian Forces overseas on UN/NATO/Peackeeping missions.
They have set up a bulletin board for people to send our peacekeepers overseas
a holliday greeting.
Has 6 different areas to send messages to. From the Golan Heights to HMCS
Halifax.
http://www.22minutes.com/default.asp