Question...

5 posts ยท Jan 25 2000 to Jan 26 2000

From: Stark, Luke <lcs@i...>

Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:22:53 -0500

Subject: Question...

> Please note: I found Starfire's Quick Start Rules a nice try, but that

Where can the quick start be found? I've ordered FT, but UPS ground is soooo
slooow. We're snowed in here at work and I'd love to have something to read...

Any recommendations on web-links for interesting FT reading? (I've read
the
FAQ, etc, I'm talking about peoples skirmishes/battle reports.)

-L

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:01:00 -0600

Subject: Re: Question...

*blush* I meant the quick start brocure that came with Task Force Games'
Starfire game, not a rule subset for FT.

Sorry.

The_Beast

"Stark, Luke"

<lcs@arepa.com> To:
"'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'" <gzg-l@vex.cs.colorado.edu>
Sent by: cc:

                    owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Be        Subject:     Question...

rkeley.EDU

                    01/25/00 12:22 PM

Please respond to

                    gzg-l

> Please note: I found Starfire's Quick Start Rules a nice try, but that

Where can the quick start be found? I've ordered FT, but UPS ground is soooo
slooow. We're snowed in here at work and I'd love to have something to read...

Any recommendations on web-links for interesting FT reading? (I've read
the
FAQ, etc, I'm talking about peoples skirmishes/battle reports.)

-L

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>

Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 22:33:43 +0000

Subject: Re: Question...

> *blush* I meant the quick start brocure that came with Task Force

I think most people will find the core rules in FT are fairly
quick-start
in themselves.... ;-)

Jon (GZG)
> "Stark, Luke"

From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:33:57 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

Subject: Re: Question...

> On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Ground Zero Games wrote:

> >*blush* I meant the quick start brocure that came with Task Force

of course, there's always Retro Thrust!

http://members.xoom.com/gzg_l/retro-thrust.html

although this is more of a historical document than a lightweight FT.

tom

From: Los <los@c...>

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:50:08 -0500

Subject: Re: Question...

> "Stark, Luke" wrote:

> Any recommendations on web-links for interesting FT reading? (I've