From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:44:45 -0500
Subject: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
Too embarassed to explain. The_Beast
Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:01:35 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
> Subject: Please ignore previous on Knights Templars and Knights of St John are two different orders.
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:21:40 -0500
Subject: Re: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
*dull thud of head dropped to desktop, repeatedly* "I know this, I know this..." Scratched into subject's skin: Read, COMPREHEND, reply... "You just couldn't ignore it, could you!" *whimper* *thud* *thud* *thud*... The_Beast Chris wrote on 04/06/2006 01:01:35 PM: > >Subject: Please ignore previous on Knights
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:35:45 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Re: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
I said: > Templars and Knights of St John are two different orders. DaBeast said: > *dull thud of head dropped to desktop, repeatedly* That's okay, you were...out of order.
From: Magnus Alexandersson <m96maal@m...>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 22:46:03 +0200
Subject: Re: Please ignore previous on Knights... Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
tor 2006-04-06 klockan 13:21 -0500 skrev Doug Evans: > *dull thud of head dropped to desktop, repeatedly* I think you might need a full weeks detention in mrs Umbridge's office. /M