From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 13:17:20 -0800
Subject: Ping
I'm not seeing my replies to the list. Test, Test
Ping
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:06:00 -0600
Subject: Re: Ping
Acquired..........tracking......tracking [quoted original message omitted]
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:16:12 -0800
Subject: RE: Ping
Roger, This seems to have worked. I had replied about the Kenner MegaForce, I have about a battalion of each (short companies) Michael Brown [quoted original message omitted]
From: Tony Francis <tony.francis@k...>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:02:02 +0000
Subject: Ping
Haven't received any messages for a few days, but there's stuff in the archives... Puzzled
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:37:15 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Ping
Tony Francis schrieb: > Haven't received any messages for a few days, but there's Traffic was low, but I have been getting mails from the list Greetings Karl Heinz
From: Indy Kochte <kochte@s...>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:40:36 -0500
Subject: Re: Ping
> Tony Francis wrote: Oh, dammit! He's noticed. We were trying to keep this quiet, your surprise birthday party and all. Oh well! Cancel it for this year. We'll try again next. Mk
From: Tony Francis <tony.francis@k...>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:17:14 +0000
Subject: Re: Ping
> Indy wrote: > Tony Francis wrote: Well, you're six months early (or late - it's the same either way) so that's plenty of time for me to forget all about it ... ;-)
From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Ping
This is a test, do not respond.
From: B Lin <lin@r...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:11:31 -0700
Subject: RE: Ping
The question is, what kind of test?:) The obvious answer is not to respond, but that is what the evil overlords are trying to train you to do - to ignore obvious messages so that they can continue to plot to take over the world. The next answer is to respond, but how? A violent protest is probably not the most effective means of combatting the Evil Overlords, so a subverise reply designed to instigate free thinking and rebellion against their evil intentions is called for. Is this message subversive? Are the Overlords watching? Are you paranoid yet? The above is a NOT RESPONSE. -NOT EVIL OVERLORD > -----Original Message-----
From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Subject: RE: Ping
Heh. I can see people haven't changed much. > --- B Lin <lin@rxkinetix.com> wrote:
From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:49:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Ping
This is a test, do not reply.
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:34:54 -0800
Subject: RE: Ping
I guess I failed the test