From: mrUseless <mruseless@h...>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:04:29 -0700
Subject: pens
Hey, hey, hey, that pen doesn't only write in zero gee, it writes underwater, too. Eric in Denver (with my coffee maker plugged into a rock)
From: mrUseless <mruseless@h...>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:04:29 -0700
Subject: pens
Hey, hey, hey, that pen doesn't only write in zero gee, it writes underwater, too. Eric in Denver (with my coffee maker plugged into a rock)
From: mrUseless <mruseless@h...>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:59:48 -0700
Subject: pens
By the way, Derek, what exactly was your source for the "million dollar" financial figure? Eric (coffee maker still plugged into a rock)
From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 11:02:03 +1100
Subject: RE: pens
G'day, > By the way, Derek, what exactly was your source for the It was on a science program about NASA a few (give or take) years back on the government broadcaster down here. Though to be fair the show (or maybe a later one) did point out that they were making their money back selling them in the gift shops at NASA and Smithsonian (??).
From: mrUseless <mruseless@h...>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:23:16 -0700
Subject: RE: pens
The reason I often seek to defend such claims is that they are often exaggerated by the media. Take, for example, the "$600,000 toilet seat". This was, in part, a toilet seat. However, a little digging will find out the rest of the story. The cost was for a completely contained high-altitude toilet for use on military planes. Now, I'm no expert in toilet design, but it's not as simple as plunking a common toilet into a pressurized room. Anyway, the media heard about it and the rest is history..... Eric > It was on a science program about NASA a few (give or take) years back