painting SG figures question

24 posts ยท Feb 28 2002 to Mar 4 2002

From: Jim Hopper <jhopper@t...>

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:16:28 -0600

Subject: painting SG figures question

Has anyone taken to giving any of their figures a small touch of national
identity? For example, a small national flag patch on the arms of the figs?

I am currently painting NAC figures and am thinking about a small flag of St.
George for a British Platoon, and so on.

Does the canon history preclude this?

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:24:56 -0500

Subject: RE: painting SG figures question

From: Jim Hopper jhopper@technicalpoint.com
> I am currently painting NAC figures and am thinking about a small flag

<grin> They're your figs, paint 'em any way you like. There are no Official
Uniforms. *I* can't put flags on *my* minis, but that's because of my painting
"skills" (or maybe that I use 6mm for SG).

From: Tony Francis <tony.francis@k...>

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:31:54 +0000

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

Don't see why not - the FSE armoured car on the back cover of the SG2
rules has a French tricolour roundel on the side of the hull.

Alternatively, paint the flag for each power bloc (from FB1)

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3565/#graphic has them listed
under 'fleet emblems'

> Jim Hopper wrote:

From: Steve Pugh <steve@p...>

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:34:02 -0000

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> I am currently painting NAC figures and am thinking about a small flag

<PEDANT>
Cross of St George would denote an _English_ Platoon. British, if such a
concept exists in the NAC, would be denoted by the Union Flag.
</PEDANT>

> Does the canon history preclude this?

There's nothing in the background as written to preclude the use of national
flags to identify units from different nations within the main blocs.

From: Richard Kirke <richardkirke@h...>

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:57:09 +0000

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

Hi,

What would be more typical (I think) to see on the uniforms would be a
divisional flash indicating the unit that the platoon was part of. My troops
have divisional flashes, coz I think it looks pretty.

Of course if you say your figures are from the "1st English Division" then a
George cross (which is quite easy to paint, Genius) would be very appropriate.

Just my ignorance spreading unocntrolably (",)

From: Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@i...>

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:09:48 -0500

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

Hi Folks,

> What would be more typical (I think) to see on the uniforms would be a
then a
> George cross (which is quite easy to paint, Genius) would be very

As someone else pointed out, "Paint them however you like"...

However, I wanted some kind of "unit" marking on my NAC also. I wanted to give
my NAC some kind of flavour, without being obvious about it, so I chose the
regimental colours of the regiment they're supposedly representing. There's a
writeup in the TO&E section of
http://www.stargrunt.ca on the 123'rd battalion, Royal New Anglian Light
Infantry, and they "perpetuate the history and honours of the Queen's Own
Rifles of Canada". The regimental colours are rifle green (of course) and
scarlet.  So, I did the right shoulder board/pad/armour plate/(whatever
it is on the NAC figures) in rifle green, with a scarlet stripe. The rest of
the figure is the standard uniform colour I chose (in the case of the NAC,
it is grey fatigues - I assume they use uniforms that change colour to
match whatever terrain they're in, anyway, so the grey colour was a
"generic" colour for "in-garrison".  Or something.  Anyway, rather than
trying to paint a flash on the sleeve, doing the whole shoulder board thing
worked well, and was tres-simple to paint.  And it looks fine, which is
the important thing:)

***************************************

From: Indy Kochte <kochte@s...>

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:21:49 -0500

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca wrote:
[...]
> As someone else pointed out, "Paint them however you like"...
and
> scarlet. So, I did the right shoulder board/pad/armour

We expect to see a squad of these entered into the painting contest at ECC
this weekend.

No pressure or anything. I'll enter in something for comic relief.  ;-)

Mk

From: Derek Fulton <derekfulton@b...>

Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 00:45:04 +1100

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> At 06:57 28/02/02 +0000, Richard wrote:

Same here, I use simple shapes, easy to paint.

You can see a example here:

http://www.users.bigpond.com/derekfulton/Gallery/Gallery.htm

click on the NSL - Dirtside and Stargrunt link and look at the NSL Jager

squad, I've used a inverted yellow triangle with a black border and red
stripe. Paint the black first, then the yellow and then the stripe.

Cheers

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:04:39 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Hopper wrote:

> Has anyone taken to giving any of their figures a small touch of

I've put the union jack on the left shoulder of my NAC figures.

Cheers,

From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)

Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 10:23:32 +0100

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Richard Kirke <richardkirke@h...>

Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 16:21:12 +0000

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> I've put the union jack on the left shoulder of my NAC figures.
Show off!

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 02:32:26 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, K.H.Ranitzsch wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----

I assumed they were detachable/switch-off-able for field use. I know the
dutch flag on our uniforms is velcro-ed on, and removed in the field.

Cheers,

From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)

Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 09:11:50 +0100

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 18:08:08 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Richard Kirke wrote:

> >I've put the union jack on the left shoulder of my NAC figures.

> Show off!

Not really - the trick is not to try and the EXACT union jack, but
something which gives the impression of...

Cheers,

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 18:11:13 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, K.H.Ranitzsch wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----

That depends on my mood, really;) But as for field dress, isn't it common to
remove insignias in the field, anyway?

Cheers,

From: Neil <rppl@p...>

Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 10:30:47 -0800

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

:
> > Has anyone taken to giving any of their figures a small touch of

If you game in 6mm you are scaring me:]

From: Richard Kirke <richardkirke@h...>

Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 22:26:08 +0000

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

Derk,

Yeah I know, just joking! BTW how? Coz my brother (who was briefly on this
group but has sadly didn't have the time) has just aquired someNAC figures.

If you are prepared to give away your trade secrets ;-)

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 07:14:02 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Richard Kirke wrote:

> Derk,

Have a look at

From: Katie Lauren Lucas <katie@f...>

Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 08:31:24 +0000 (GMT)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

Quoting Derk Groeneveld <derk@cistron.nl>:

> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Hopper wrote:

At the request of the other half, one of my squad leaders has a St Andrew's
cross on his helmet (he's somewhat serious about his scottish ancestry... the
idea being that figure can be swapped in as the platoon commander if he's
running the NAC) The other squad leaders have various other logos made of
red/white/blue on their heads.

From: Richard Kirke <richardkirke@h...>

Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:49:35 +0000

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

Nice minis! Cheers, I think I can see how, forwarded to my brother now

Cheers

Richard

> From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@cistron.nl>

From: DAWGFACE47@w...

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 08:50:52 -0600 (CST)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

those are nice soldiers, nice paint jobs; my only "complaint" with GZG
and  DENIZEN  figures/vehicles and etc, are that they are smaller than
my much loved V1, V2, and V3 40K IG troopers (star grunts, generic IG
metal and plastic, metal cadians, metal and plastic  catachans - ie the
ones that have a soldier feel and look! LOL i even like the HOLLYWEIRD butt
ugly steroid pumped plastic catachans).

sigh. i am holding out (probably wasting my time!) for plastic multipiece
cadians, which tened to look more like soldiers than the rest of the IG
figures now in production.

i like the EM-4 plastic troopers (which are  hard to come by in NOWHAR
TN) as they are close to the size of the aulde IG, and the new COPPLESTONE and
FOUNDRY stuff for the same reason.

the same comments apply to the gangers and militia types that see use in my
games as space pirates, gangers, rebels, psychopukers, shadowpunkers, and etc.

hurra! for MR . T!!!!!!!

DAWGIE

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:51:22 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Richard Kirke wrote:

> Nice minis! Cheers, I think I can see how, forwarded to my brother now

Thanks, and quite welcome:)

Cheers,

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:57:43 +0100 (CET)

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 DAWGFACE47@webtv.net wrote:

> those are nice soldiers, nice paint jobs; my only "complaint" with

And even worse than that, the GZG and Denizen miniatures even have.. *GASP*
realistic proportions! No oversized heads, muscles or way too big weaponry!;)
I vastly prefer the GZG and Denezin figures, myself.

I have to agree though, that the old style IG were fairly decent figures; I
have a squad of those running about somewhere, too. They tend to team up with
my grenadier figures;)

Cheers,

From: Derek Fulton <derekfulton@b...>

Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 10:03:14 +1100

Subject: Re: painting SG figures question

> At 09:49 4/03/02 +0000, you wrote:

Yes, nice miniatures.

Cheers