OTSuez. (was nukes ..tunnels.. boom)

2 posts ยท Mar 11 2002 to Mar 11 2002

From: Bob DeAngelis <bobdea@t...>

Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:54:56 +0100

Subject: OTSuez. (was nukes ..tunnels.. boom)

Jonathan White says
> > bullet. I suggest you consult a good late C20

John Atkinson said
> Didn't that backfire rather badly?

Yes it did as most older Brits still remember. A perhaps badly considered
colonial exercise much like that of the US in Panama, was followed by a very
successful military operation that achieved most of it's objectives within the
operational time frame. It went wrong as you put it when the USA and other oil
based economies crapped their oil based economic pants, left their former
allies in the shit and supported diplomatically the Arab nations that Mr
Atkinson loves to denigrate on this list. It's worth noting that the strength
the Arab nations and Egypt in particular got from this US led boost gave
Nasser the required impetus and standing in the Arab world to infect the whole
Arab sphere of influence with his own rampant brand of Arab nationalism.
Maybe, just maybe, the whole saying that you reap what you sow is perfectly
apt here. One wonders if Suez had had a different result if the whole bloody
middle east mess, Islamic fundamentalism and even the events of
sept 11 might have taken a different course.   That of course would have
required the same level of unfailing allied commitment that the UK has shown
the US in the last 30 years. (I do enjoy alternative histories)

From: db-ft@w... (David Brewer)

Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:05:48 +0000

Subject: Re: OTSuez. (was nukes ..tunnels.. boom)

> Bob DeAngelis wrote:

> PS please note this post is without bias, rancour, bad language or

What were you thinking?