From: Derek Fulton <derekfulton@b...>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 11:47:22 +1000
Subject: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
> At 04:40 13/05/02 -0700, John wrote: I haven't played since moving to Hobart. Cheers
[OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
From: Warren Shultzaberger <carol.warren@p...>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 07:39:30 -0400
Subject: RE: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
> At 04:40 13/05/02 -0700, John wrote: I used to. I'm having trouble finding people with enough time on their hands to play a good game of anything. :-(
From: Derek Fulton <derekfulton@b...>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 00:04:37 +1000
Subject: RE: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
> At 07:39 14/05/02 -0400, Warren wrote: One of my regular opponents back in Townsville passed away. Your having trouble finding them, I'm having trouble keeping my opponents alive:) Cheers
From: Robert W. Eldridge <bob_eldridge@m...>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 23:20:13 -0400
Subject: Re: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
Sure, I play all of the Admiralty Trilogy games(Harpoon, Command at Sea, and Fear God and Dreadnought) as often as I can. [quoted original message omitted]
From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 19:44:56 +1000
Subject: Re: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
BTW IMHO "Warship Commander II" by Enola Games is a far more realistic non-computer simulation. Available through
From: Derek Fulton <derekfulton@b...>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 22:55:13 +1000
Subject: Re: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
> At 07:44 17/05/02 +1000, Alan wrote: I have a copy of this, good explanations about post WWII naval development in the front. Cheers
From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 17:59:47 +1000
Subject: Re: [OT] Who plays Harpoon, was Re: Fighters
From: "Derek Fulton" <derekfulton@bigpond.com> > >BTW IMHO "Warship Commander II" by Enola Games is a far more