[OT] We were soldiers

9 posts ยท Mar 19 2002 to Mar 19 2002

From: Brian Bell <bkb@b...>

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:26:38 -0500

Subject: [OT] We were soldiers

This may have been discussed on list and I missed it, but...

I just saw "We were Soldiers". I will not comment on the historical accuracy
or tactics (as I would probably say something stupid). But as a theatrical
production, I thought that it was well done. It treated everything with due
respect. It had a lot of action. And it heroism tinged with the bittersweet of
loss.

I would rate this one high (almost 'must see'). I do caution you that it has
graphic violence (like the 1st part of Private Ryan).

Now back to your regularly scheduled flame war...

---

From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:33:10 -0800

Subject: Re: [OT] We were soldiers

> From: "Brian Bell" <bbell1@insight.rr.com>

> This may have been discussed on list and I missed it, but...

I've made myself an interesting promise, i will not go see either this movie
or BHD until I've read the corresponding book. Just started into "We Were
Soldiers Once, and Young." I'll do a book report as soon as I find time to
finish it (Before which I have to tackle 2 books on the 1915 Turkish genocide
of the Kurds a friend sent me. Such a fun reading list before
me).

3B^2

From: Randall L Joiner <rljoiner@m...>

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:49:58 -0500

Subject: Re: [OT] We were soldiers

A friend of mine and his father[1] went to see this... His father made two
comments...  They didn't use a specific model of M-16 that they show
being used in the movie, and that a model of Grenade launcher wasn't used that

early in the war.

[1]  Considering my friends father volunteered for 2 tours in
Vietnam[2], leading a combat engineer force, I tend to take his opinion as
gospel when (and if) he speaks up about such matters.
[2]  A war I know precious little about. [3]
[3]  I prefer pre-gun-powder, or post FTL [4]
[4]  How long can I run footnotes? [5]
[5]  To long... [5]

> At 07:26 PM 3/18/02 -0500, you wrote:

From: DAWGFACE47@w...

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:14:43 -0600 (CST)

Subject: Re: [OT] We were soldiers

is the book and the movie about the BATTLE FOR LZ ALBANY by any chance?

From: Noel Weer <noel.weer@v...>

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:31:04 -0600

Subject: RE: [OT] We were soldiers

The book is X-Ray and Albany.
The movie is just X-Ray.

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Brian Bell <bkb@b...>

Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:41:33 -0500

Subject: RE: [OT] We were soldiers

The movie indicated LZ X-Ray.

From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>

Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:28:40 -0800

Subject: Re: [OT] We were soldiers

> DAWGFACE47 wrote:

> is the book and the movie about the BATTLE FOR LZ ALBANY by any

I'm not sure, I haven't gotten TO the book yet, been foing housework. Where in
Vietnam was LZ Albany?

3B^2

From: DAWGFACE47@w...

Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:42:39 -0600 (CST)

Subject: Re: [OT] We were soldiers

LZ ALBANY AND LZ  X-RAY WERE THE FIRST CAV'S  FIRST  ENCOUNTER WITH
LARGE NVA FORCES.

X-RAY WAS A REAL SHITSTORM.

ALBANY WAS ANOTHER REAL SHITSTORM FOUGHT BY A FRESH BATTALION OF CAV A
DAY OR TEO AFTER X-RAY.

From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>

Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 07:52:06 -0800

Subject: Re: [OT] We were soldiers

> From: DAWGFACE47@webtv.net

> LZ ALBANY AND LZ X-RAY WERE THE FIRST CAV'S FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH

Then yes, this is about those places. The book was written by the Cav unit's
CO, IIRC.

3B^2