OT, was Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"

2 posts ยท Jun 19 1998 to Jun 19 1998

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>

Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 14:36:57 +0200

Subject: OT, was Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"

> Mark Siefert wrote:

> (Joe... where in the HELL did you

In the biology class...? ;-)

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 08:54:14 -0500

Subject: Re: OT, was Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"

Well, as the the high ranking officers of EF are generals, I always assumed
that the armies won the various interservice rivalries, absorbing the navies
and air forces of the constituent countries, and used whatever
terminology they felt like. ;->=

'Cruiser? That's what I used to pick up chicks on the main drag back home.
Destroyer, now THAT'S impressive nomenclature for a piece of FM!'

Sorry, Jons, I promise any further comment, obviously getting way OT, will go
to the B5 news group. Come to think of it, I see if Dejanews can search up an
answer from JMS hisself.

The_Beast