Shameless self promotion! A bounder and a cad, no doubt!
Sir, and it pains me to use such a term in your case, I demand satisfaction!
Struthers and Barton Patent Electric Pellet Pistols at dawn!
Long live Her Imperial Royal Majesty!
Up with Exclamation Points!
My seconds shall call.
Hello, all,
That's a lot of acronyms in the subject -- translated, it means that The
Miniatures Page is holding a contest for Victorian Science-Fiction
scenarios. Voting has started and ends 2/25 (midnight, I believe).
This is
the first cut to select 5 entries which will then run-off to gain the 3
prizes.
I would first like to draw attention to the contest, which has some really
neat scenario ideas, and specifically I would like to draw attention to that
scenario entitled "Teddy and the Major-General's daughter".
If y'all wouldn't mind moseying by TMP and casting a vote for "Teddy" and up
to 4 other scenarios, I would greatly appreciate it.
http://theminiaturespage.com/polls/?id=587432545
FMA, SG or FT rules?
:-)
The last duel that I saw in gaming was several years ago at CanCon. We were
playing a Honor Harrington freeform based around the Battle of Seaford 9 (with
the Bridge Crew simulator running the rest of the
sessions -
one team got a grav-lance equipped vessel, due to their captain
volunteering to prove the system worked; it didn't). They had to dig out some
d6, as even though it was in the character briefings, they hadn't thought a
duel would actually be provoked.
Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies
> -----Original Message-----
IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail
1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for
viruses and defects. 2. This e-mail (including any
attachments) may contain confidential information for the use of the intended
recipient. 3. If you are not the intended recipient, please: contact the
sender by return
e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and
delete and destroy all copies of this e-mail. 4. Any views
expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not
a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise stated. 5.
Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any other readers are aware
of these restrictions.
> FMA, SG or FT rules?
Does it matter, Brendan? I'm universally lousy!
Apologies, Nick; I'm not a member at TMP, and am trying to hold down new
places on the net with my footprint. However, best of luck!
Do people still call it 'Vicky Sci Fi'? I love it; wrong in soooo many
ways...
The_Beast
> Nicholas Caldwell wrote:
It is? Huh. I didn't even blink at it. ;-)
> -- translated, it means that The
This is
> the first cut to select 5 entries which will then run-off to gain the
and up
> to 4 other scenarios, I would greatly appreciate it.
So, you're soliciting for votes, like a good politician. What's in it for us?
What do we get out of it? How much are you willing to *pay* for these votes?
Who or what is your backing? What are your forums?? What's your position on
[insert topic here]?
Come on, man, expiring minds wanna know...
:-)
Mk
> Indy wrote:
> What's your position on [insert topic here]?
What's his stance on soap bubbles? Does he intend to lobby on behalf of
FB3? Is he a vector or a cinematic candidate? WHAT, the electorate asks,
is he doing about The GW Question?
I don't get to that part of the site, but my good friend tells me the scenario
placed second. As that's to Chris Palmer's entry, part of the design pair of
G.A.S.L.I.G.H.T., a gentleman of wit and imagination, I can say but one
thing...
WAY TO GO, NICK!
"It's great; I'd already printed the scenerio out and planned on running it
for you guys."
For what I'm about to receive, may I be truly worthy. ;->=
The_Beast
Wow -- I thought that name sounded familiar but I didn't put it
together.
Thanks for everyone who took the time to vote! And thanks to everyone
else for not flaming me for posting off-topic posts! :-)
Hey, I'd be delighted to hear about it if anyone runs the scenario for their
own gaming group.
Nick
[quoted original message omitted]