From: DOCAgren@a...
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:20:47 EST
Subject: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
Congrads on getting Saddam. And as they are saying this am Engineering unit were in on the Raider Team, Well done John A.
OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:46:48 -0800
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
!!! Yup, it's on CNN. Funny, I was expecting him to be caught a lot closer to the 2004 elections, but I'm a cynic. Good Job 4th Inf!!! > DOCAgren@aol.com wrote: > Congrads on getting Saddam.
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Michael Llaneza wrote: > !!! I'm glad you said that & not I...:) Perhaps Shrub's saving Osama for the campaign? Hopefully having Saddam locked up will discourage some of the crazies in Iraq. Brian > Good Job 4th Inf !!!
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:20:17 -0600
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
Funny, I was expecting him to be caught a lot closer to the 2004 elections, but I'm a cynic. I'm glad you said that & not I...:) Perhaps Shrub's saving Osama for the campaign? *The WMD is the October surprise.......) I'm no cynic just a realest.... Hopefully having Saddam locked up will discourage some of the crazies in Iraq. *Let us hope so! And knowing I'll never hear the end of this from John A and I'm not minding it a damn.......) Way to go 4thID!
From: Jared Hilal <jlhilal@y...>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
> --- Don M <dmaddox1@hot.rr.com> wrote: <...must...resist...urge...to bash...Daladier, err Chretien > > *The WMD is the October surprise.......) I'm no cynic just a I think probably the WMDs are a result of Saddam exaggerating in the 1991 weapons report to the UN in an effort try and boost his perceived power and it turned around and bit him on the butt when the Bush admin. wanted an accounting of 10X tons of chemicals and 10Y tons of bio-agents and he couldn't account for them because they never existed, but the estimates were in good faith from his own claims. Any fissionables have already disappeared into an Iranian power plant, just like his airforce did in 1991.:) J
From: Edward Lipsett <translation@i...>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:57:15 +0900
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
His airforce disappeared into an Iranian power plant!? Paper airplanes? Or hydrogen-filled blimps, perhaps? > on 03.12.15 1:53 PM, Jared Hilal at jlhilal@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jared Hilal <jlhilal@y...>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
> --- Edward Lipsett <translation@intercomltd.com> wrote: Well.. into Iranian clutches, anyway. J
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 23:13:19 -0600
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
think probably the WMDs are a result of Saddam exaggerating in the 1991 weapons report to the UN in an effort try and boost his perceived power and it turned around and bit him on the butt when the Bush admin. wanted an accounting of 10X tons of chemicals and 10Y tons of bio-agents and he couldn't account for them because they never existed, but the estimates were in good faith from his own claims. Any fissionables have already disappeared into an Iranian power plant, just like his airforce did in 1991.:) Time will tell.
From: Mark A. Siefert <cthulhu@c...>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 23:20:11 -0600
Subject: RE: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
Look, folks. This has thread the potential to degrade into a nasty flame war. As much as I believe in the free flow of ideas and healthy political debate, I don't think that this is the place to do it. I've seen friendships break up over this war and I hate to see it happen here. Later,
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:02:25 -0600
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
Blimps he didn't use would have been cheaper then the planes he 'exported' to Iran... and a higher energy coefficient then mere paper. Problem for him was he was Warsaw Pact (WSP) without the training, supply, or cohesion/morale. I guess you could say he was "WSP LIte' in 1991. Wonder which of the "There are 3 kinds of army" that was? LOL! Gracias, Glenn Hx, SF, and Fx: 6 mm figures, Starships and 1:6K "Wet Navy" warships are my main interest. But I have forces in 6 through 25 mm FWIW... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:57:15 +0900 Edward Lipsett > <translation@intercomltd.com> writes:
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:05:01 -0600
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
Into Iranian reactors? Wait! Maybe we can head off another diplomatic spat with this vital piece of information! That's why iran has an accounting problem in this matter - they forgot to figure in the ex-Iraq airplanes they fed into the reactors! I'll stop laughing eventually. Gracias, Glenn Hx, SF, and Fx: 6 mm figures, Starships and 1:6K "Wet Navy" warships are my main interest. But I have forces in 6 through 25 mm FWIW... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:03:35 -0800 (PST) Jared Hilal <jlhilal@yahoo.com> writes: > --- Edward Lipsett <translation@intercomltd.com> wrote:
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:07:46 -0600
Subject: Re: OT US 4th Inf in Iraq
Okay, I think we've had some fun with this but it could go 'nuclear' so I'll let the thread drop. Even though I have no problem with someone having a different view of my commander -in-chief/politics/international relations. At least he didn't call him Flores... No, really, I'll stop now. promise. Gracias, Glenn Hx, SF, and Fx: 6 mm figures, Starships and 1:6K "Wet Navy" warships are my main interest. But I have forces in 6 through 25 mm FWIW... On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 23:20:11 -0600 "Mark A. Siefert" > <siefertma@wi.rr.com> writes: