From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 08:36:05 -0500
Subject: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> >If you havn't seen this before please do it now.
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 08:36:05 -0500
Subject: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> >If you havn't seen this before please do it now.
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
Someone said something amusing to me about "no politics on list", and I agreed to stop posting politically-slanted items. Laserlight, I think this qualifies too. Just a reminder,
From: DOCAgren@a...
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:46:23 EST
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
In a message dated 4/3/03 2:01:38 AM, > owner-gzg-digest@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU writes: << Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:58:02 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Burger <yh728@victoria.tc.ca> Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops Someone said something amusing to me about "no politics on list", and I agreed to stop posting politically-slanted items. Laserlight, I think this qualifies too. Just a reminder, Brian. > [quoted text omitted] And given that a # of our list members are currently/have been deployed, I see nothing wrong with it.
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:26:48 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> At 11:58 PM -0800 4/1/03, Brian Burger wrote: Supporting the troops is perhaps political. But as Doc said, we've got members of this community that are over there right now. If I knew what John A. looked like I'd have kept a close eye for him on the feeds here. As I don't, I can't. But I still look for AVLBs and other folks that I know on TV and hope they don't come back via Germany (or worse). At any rate, I think this topic does not qualify as political for the previously mentioned reasons. Our friends are in harms way and we're thinking about them. Nothing wrong with that. PS Are You really want John to know you weren't thinking about him while he was over there?
From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:48:36 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
You are of course correct, that is unless we want to actually avoid a flamewar on the list. Roger Books > On 4-Apr-03 at 11:49, DOCAgren@aol.com (DOCAgren@aol.com) wrote:
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:07:24 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> At 2:48 PM -0500 4/4/03, Roger Books wrote: Well, John isn't here so it shouldn't be that big...He'll be sad he missed it. I can imaging his response.... Damn I hope he's ok. He's going to be in quite the demand for all those canal and river crossings in Bagdad.
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ryan M Gill wrote: > At 2:48 PM -0500 4/4/03, Roger Books wrote: I think - from comments John made before leaving, and the current news - that he's probably on a ship somewhere around the Straits of Hormuz, having spent a few weeks sailing in circles off Turkey. He's probably worried he's going to miss the interesting parts of the show... I know he said he'd volunteered as a shipboard vehicle-babysitter, and I think his Corp is the one that was supposed to deploy to Turkey before the Turks decided not to follow all of Washington's script. Look, my comment about keeping pro/anti-war msgs off-list was based on the wording of the original forward - it had a pro-war slant, IMO. "Defending our freedom" and similar propaganda not applicable to the current situation. It was NOT based on contempt for troops anywhere, onlist or off. I'm not going to fall into the trap of blaming the soldiers for the orders they're given. Now, if anyone really, really wants to debate further, let's get it OFF LIST. I was going to talk to Laserlight about it off-list, until the thread resurfaced here. Brian. > --
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:25:17 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> At 2:07 PM -0800 4/4/03, Brian Burger wrote: The 4th ID started unloading their ships at the beginning of the week. Which means he's either waiting off shore for a clear berth or he's running up a road with his AVLB on a transporter. > Look, my comment about keeping pro/anti-war msgs off-list was based on "Defending > our freedom" and similar propaganda not applicable to the current FEH!
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:49:53 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [OT] Thank-you note for the troops
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ryan M Gill wrote: > PS Are You really want John to know you weren't thinking about him <grin> There are several ways to take that, few of them good... I do want him to stay safe - we had grand political discussions/flamewars! Any further on this would get outright political instantly, so I'll leave it at this. Brian. > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------