From: Germ <germ@g...>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:18:20 -0000
Subject: Re: [OT] style sheets
> The problem is irregular HTML - the 1997 era stuff: all font Thanks Steve you've just described my website:) Jeremey
[OT] style sheets
From: Steve Pugh <steve@p...>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:34:49 -0000
Subject: Re: [OT] style sheets
> > The problem is irregular HTML - the 1997 era stuff: all font
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:25:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [OT] style sheets
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:18:20 -0000, "Germ" <germ@germy.co.uk> wrote: > The problem is irregular HTML - the 1997 era stuff: all font He described mine... until this latest version that uses CSS!
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [OT] style sheets
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Germ wrote: > > The problem is irregular HTML - the 1997 era stuff: all font I think I avoid some of these 'sins', at least. No spacer gifs; all my formatting is done by tables, but that only because there ISN'T another way to do it in HTML. I try and avoid nested tables, they just get ugly in short order. And I still use FONT tags because, first they work, and second I haven't taught myself CSS yet... OTOH, my HTML is entirely hand-coded and I'm pretty careful. The only reason my pages aren't W3C HTML3.2/4 certifiable is because of the really, really terrible coding the various free suppliers use in their ad banners! (Last time I tried to W3C cert my pages w/ their online checker, EVERY ERROR that I got back was in one part or another of Freeserver's code, not mine...)