[OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

13 posts · Mar 27 2001 to Mar 28 2001

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>

Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:46:39 +0100

Subject: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

The dog thinks: "They feed me, love me and take care of me, they must be
Gods...."
The cat thinks:  "They feed me, love me and  take care of me, _I_ must
be a
God...."

;-)

Jon (GZG)
> Cheers,

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:05:39 +0200 (CEST)

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Ground Zero Games wrote:

> The dog thinks: "They feed me, love me and take care of me, they must

Now which one is clearly displaying signs of (vastly superior) intelligence?
mmm?

Cheers,

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>

Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:36:29 +0200

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> Derk Groeneveld wrote:

> The dog thinks: "They feed me, love me and take care of me, they must

The dog, of course. It doesn't have any delusions :-)

...besides, the latest cat I saw spent five minutes chasing its own tail
around the leg of a table. That one at least didn't display any signs of
"vastly superior intelligence" whatsoever...

<G>

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:07:00 +0200 (CEST)

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

> Derk Groeneveld wrote:

And hence will always be the lsoer.

> ...besides, the latest cat I saw spent five minutes chasing its own

Ah! A deep cover mole...

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>

Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:17:06 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

When I first played FT, we were playing on the floor of a rec room -
great
big space, it was wonderful - and we used tin foil balls for asteroids.
Given that we were playing in a two-cat household, our first ever house
rule was, "If a cat rearranges the playing area on us, the rearrangement
stands!"

They batted the asteroids around a couple of times, but never went after the
ships.

From: Eli Arndt <emu2020@c...>

Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:42:25 -0800

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

And so Brian discovers an effective method for in game asteroid movement.

Eli

P.S. What would Giant Space Cat stats be like?

> They batted the asteroids around a couple of times, but never went

From: Andy Cowell <andy@c...>

Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:48:32 -0600

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

In message
<Pine.LNX.3.96.1010328000637.15831I-100000@derk.penguinpowered.com>,
> Derk Groeneveld writes:

You think Space/Dirt will cause conflict, wait until you start bashing
pet choices!

It's just crying out for a FMASk adaptation:

From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)

Date: 28 Mar 2001 06:38 GMT

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----

> >Now which one is clearly displaying signs of (vastly superior)

That cat was playing. I thought playing and gaming was a sign of vastly
superior intelligence?

;-)

From: Mark Sykes <tardis@b...>

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:32:16 +1000

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> At 2:38 PM +0800 28/3/2001, KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de wrote:

Or...
Dogs come when they are called.

Cats will take a message.

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 07:56:03 -0500

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> That cat was playing. I thought playing and gaming was a sign of

Depends on what rules you're using. The cat was probably playing a

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:13:36 +0100

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> That cat was playing. I thought playing and gaming was a sign of

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:50:47 -0500

Subject: RE: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> That cat was playing. I thought playing and gaming was a sign of

I said:
> Depends on what rules you're using. The cat was probably playing a

Jon replied:
> Does that mean it would have to roll a 6 before it could catch its
(And the Advanced tail-catching rules would be previewed in the next WD
and then released as a hardback book....?)

And it would be obligatory, which means your investment in tailless Manx cats
is now worthless.

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:27:34 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: [OT] space cats (was: Re: Starship Basing Alternatives)

> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Ground Zero Games wrote:

> >> That cat was playing. I thought playing and gaming was a sign of

True, but the tail would get an agility save, so the cat would probably keep
fruitlessly chasing it's tail until it realized it was operation with a
useless set of rules!

At which point it would change rulesets, like any intelligent being...

:>