[OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

5 posts ยท Dec 23 2004 to Dec 23 2004

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>

Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:08:17 +1100

Subject: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

G'day,

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:27:42 -0600

Subject: Re: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

Thanks for correcting my failure to change subject! Do as I say, not as I
do...

My employer uses a totally different mail system, so I'm working on hearsay,
but when I said M$ Outlook, I was also thinking M$ Exchange, which I think is
the mail server software you hook up with, which prolly means you're SOL for
having a meaningful correction.

The weird thing was that your post five minutes after the
position-of-women-in-societies post DIDN'T have the attachment.

Clue one? Not I.

The_Beast

owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU wrote on 12/23/2004 07:08:17 AM:

> G'day,

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>

Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:57:06 +1100

Subject: RE: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

G'day,

> The weird thing was that your post five minutes

Makes sense to me though. I started that post in some down time on a works
station I couldn't VPN from so was using the web interface and then finished
it later on my laptop. All the others I wrote only on my laptop. Ok from now
must avoid the interface;)

Have fun

From: Warbeads@a...

Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:52:53 EST

Subject: Re: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

In a message dated 12/23/04 5:08:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> Beth.Fulton@csiro.au writes:

G'day,

> Beth, that post had a M$ Outlook(?) supplied attachment that probably

The latest stuff was sent from my laptop where I've turned off absolutely
every thing that isn't plain text so I'm at a loss. Any exchange server
afficinados (or people know of sites) that have a checklist I can tick off to
try and stop this problem from happening?

Thanks

Beth

With or without explosives? Seriously, it's probably something the server does
and it probably is advertising that 'pays the bills' type thing. You should be
familiar with the same kind of c... detritus... that accompanies research
grants.

Gracias,

From: Warbeads@a...

Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:53:48 EST

Subject: Re: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

In a message dated 12/23/04 5:29:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> devans@nebraska.edu writes:

Thanks for correcting my failure to change subject! Do as I say, not as
 I
do...

My employer uses a totally different mail system, so I'm working on hearsay,
but when I said M$ Outlook, I was also thinking M$ Exchange, which I think is
the mail server software you hook up with, which prolly means you're SOL for
having a meaningful correction.

The weird thing was that your post five minutes after the
position-of-women-in-societies post DIDN'T have the  attachment.

Clue one? Not I.

The_Beast

<snip>

Microsoft happens.

Gracias,