[OT]Not-Stupid question about sloped armour

2 posts ยท May 1 2002 to May 1 2002

From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>

Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 16:52:33 +1000

Subject: Re: [OT]Not-Stupid question about sloped armour

> This has been bothering me for awhile. How does sloped armour gain

> This has been bothering me for awhile. How does sloped armour gain

As you surmised, Armour sloped at 60 degrees is effectively twice the
thickness
of armour at 0 degrees.  ( Multiply raw thickness by 1/cos(Slope) )
Trouble is, you need twice as much to cover the same vertical area. So no
gain, right?

Except that almost no hits are exactly square-on. They're at about 15-20
degrees
or more. So a slope of 0 degrees becomes an effective slope of 15-20
degrees. Not a huge gain (1.06). But a slope of 60 degrees becomes an
effective slope
of 70-75 degrees. And 75 degrees is about 4 times (3.86) as effective.

There are complications - conventional solid shells tend to veer in the
direction of greatest resistance when they hit armour, so the formula is at
best an approximation. OTOH at really high angles, they'll bounce off. OTOH
Plunging fire at long range will also decrease the effective slope. For really
high velocities you can best think of the collision as a slug of fluid hitting
a sheet of fluid, so the mechanics are different again etc etc.

A reasonable rule of thumb would be to say that armour sloped at 60 degrees
weighs twice as much, but is 3.5 times as effective, as the same thickness of
armour sloped at zero. 100mm at 0 degrees protects *in the field* about as
well

From: Roger Books <books@m...>

Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 03:05:31 -0400 (EDT)

Subject: Re: [OT]Not-Stupid question about sloped armour

> On 1-May-02 at 02:52, Alan E Brain (aebrain@webone.com.au) wrote:

Thanks for the explanation. I can now sleep easier, well, once
the restore completes and _if_ our DBAs can do their first ever
complete Oracle and database rebuild from tape anyway.

Short answer: sloped armour is more than just a thickness increase.