From: Christopher K Smith <smithck@m...>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:15:39 -0500
Subject: [OT]-Missing Something?
Did I miss something concerning the list? The FT traffic has been just about nil lately and no one is using the [FT], [DS2], [SG], or [OT] tags anymore. Just wondering
From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:15:42 PDT
Subject: Re: [OT]-Missing Something?
Hey, don't begrudge us ground pounders our day in the sun. I still haven't figured out what [OT] meants. Brian Bilderback > From: "Christopher K Smith" <smithck72@home.com>
From: Aron_Clark@d...
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:17:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [OT]-Missing Something?
> I still haven't figured out what [OT] meants. Off Topic...
From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:27:15 PDT
Subject: Re: [OT]-Missing Something?
> From: Aron_Clark@digidesign.com Thanks. I was leaning towards Otter Tracks. Or Old Toenails.
From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:33:10 +1000
Subject: Re: [OT]-Missing Something?
G'day, > Did I miss something concerning the list? The FT traffic has been just That's because we're all outside by the postbox waiting for FB2 to arrive;) > and no one is using the [FT], [DS2], [SG], or [OT] tags Umm that'd be because the new guys don't know and the old guys are getting lazy/forgetful I guess. Rest assured you haven't missed anything its just the ebbs and flows... Beth
From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:22:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [OT]-Missing Something?
> Did I miss something concerning the list? The FT traffic has been just
From: Steve Pugh <steve@p...>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:25:49 +0100
Subject: Re: [OT]-Missing Something?
> >Did I miss something concerning the list? The FT traffic has been burp. Got the corrected edition yesterday. At last the elusive page 34. ;-) Is that the crudest joke to ever appear in a set of wargames rules?