From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:22:22 -0800
Subject: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
GW has acquired the rights to Lord of the Rings: http://www.games-workshop.com/lotr/
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:22:22 -0800
Subject: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
GW has acquired the rights to Lord of the Rings: http://www.games-workshop.com/lotr/
From: Popeyesays@a...
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:30:52 EST
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
In a message dated 1/30/01 5:36:18 PM Central Standard Time, > s_schoon@pacbell.net writes: > GW has acquired the rights to Lord of the Rings: What an awful shame. I wonder in what dire way they will turn it into shit before our very eyes.
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:46:06 -0800
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> What an awful shame. I wonder in what dire way they will turn it into Now, now. While I'd rather not get into the GW-Holy-War issue, they do make quality figs, assuming you like that style. While I don't think anyone would argue that they are overpriced, their production standards are as good as anyone else in the business. I strongly suspect that they're trying to "diversify" into a more mass-market based game to broaden their customer base.
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> > GW has acquired the rights to Lord of the Rings: Just consider the 6 foot tall hobbit to be the start. Bye for now,
From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:41:47 +1100
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> Just consider the 6 foot tall hobbit to be the That's just Turnip the Hobbit by adoption... I must now retreat to a bomb shelter before the Pratchett loving Narns track me down and lynch me;) Beth
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:49:30 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> --- Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au> wrote: Lets just 'Nick' that Turpin in the bud right now! And for the record, the OU ships I have just ordered are called, CVLs: Black Swan and Lyerbird. Other interesting names to follow. Bye for now,
From: Jeremy Sadler <jsadler@e...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:42:30 +1100
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> GW has acquired the rights to Lord of the Rings: <sigh> And how dumbed down will this game be? ---
From: Jeremey Claridge <jeremy.claridge@k...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:31:47 +0000 ()
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> GW has acquired the rights to Lord of the Rings: Anyone else notice the statement from GW was by the "Chief Financial Officer of Games Workshop" So at least it's not just about making money then:)
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:47:32 EST
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:49:30 -0800 (PST) John Leary
> <john_t_leary@yahoo.com> writes:
Groan! [I love it]
> And for the record, the OU ships I have just ordered
How about a converted CVL into a cloaked Intruder/Raider - Liar Bird aka
as 'the bird' to it's crew members.... Best I can do on *any* notice. I
/do/ make a great audience - I laugh at most any joke... even if it
wasn't meant as a joke {refer to upper management as an example}
From: Chris Lowrey <clowrey@p...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:01:50 -0600
Subject: RE: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> > What an awful shame. I wonder in what dire way they Six foot hobbit, built like Schwarzeneger, with a purple mohawk and a
From: Brian Bell <bkb@b...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:38:34 -0500
Subject: RE: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
My big fear is that the game will be magic heavy. Tolkien had a wonderfully subtle magic. No fireballs, lightning bolts, death spells. Most of the magic was infused into objects, IIRC. The exceptions I remember are: 1) Gandalf adding horses to the foam on a released river. 2) The imprisonment of Gandalf (hmmm. I can't remember if the BOOKS had stated if he was imprisoned by a spell or not. The cartoon movie did). All the other uses of magic that I remember were done with or through objects (fireworks, swords, armor, crystal balls, rings, etc.). Perhaps we should take another look at FMA Skirmish or Stargrunt II with medieval extensions. And, yes, I do fear a 28mm Gandalf with each bicep bigger than his head.
From: sagan1 <sagan1@f...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:42:49 -0700
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
Well knowing workshop they will take every bit of money you got and leave with a game that you hate and they will drop it two months later. [quoted original message omitted]
From: bbrush@u...
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:40:34 -0600
Subject: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
I would like to clarify one thing about this. GW has acquired the rights to
the MOVIE license, not the books. From what I hear on the GW lists it's
possible the first will be a skirmish (54 mm?) game ala Inquisitor (whatever
that is).
Resume standard anti-GW frothing.
Ronin
owner-gzg-digest@lists.CSUA.Be
rkeley.EDU (The GZG Digest) To:
gzg-digest@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Sent by: cc:
owner-gzg-digest@lists.CSUA.Be Subject:
The GZG Digest V2 #301 rkeley.EDU
01/31/01 01:00 AM
Please respond to gzg-l
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:22:22 -0800
From: Popeyesays@a...
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:53:05 EST
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
In a message dated 1/31/01 6:39:23 AM Central Standard Time, > Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil writes: > The cartoon movie did). All the other uses of magic that Also Gandalf used fireballs or lightning when he battle alone on the hill where the others were seeking him. They observed the flashes of light, etc. Some heavy duty magic went on went Gandalf battled the Balrog as well. But generally speaking Gandalf's spells were subtle and objects of magic were the big guns - the rings, Glamdring, Sting, the broken sword reforged, etc.
From: Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@c...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:33:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" wrote:
From: Corey Burger <burgundavia@c...>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:34:52 -0800
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
I wonder if I can harness the power from J.R.R's corpse turning rpm's in his grave
From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:40:07 +1100
Subject: RE: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
ha, ha, ha, *whack*, he, he, he... ROTFL Neath Southern Skies -http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/ [MKW2] Admiral Peter Rollins - Task Force Zulu-Beta [Firestorm] Battletech PBeM GM > -----Original Message-----
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:16:04 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [OT] GW Lord of the Rings
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Beth Fulton wrote: > >Just consider the 6 foot tall hobbit to be the Lynch you? That's rather barbaric - we'll either turn the Narn bat squad loose or perhaps let Mr.Tulip loose on you. (you have read 'The Truth', haven't you?) Brian - yh728@victoria.tc.ca - - http://warbard.iwarp.com/games.html - > Beth