[OT] Entirely off-topic: English Civil War rules

4 posts ยท Mar 13 2003 to Mar 16 2003

From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>

Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:05:25 +0000

Subject: [OT] Entirely off-topic: English Civil War rules

I'm not much of a traditional wargamer: mostly I play SF, with a side order of
fantasy. However, I have in mind a project which requires a simulation of the
technology and tactics of the English Civil War (the
second one, that is, 1642-1651) - musket and pike, mainly - in a
full-scale battle. Can anyone recommend the best rule-set for this
purpose?

(Feel free to reply directly to me, rather than to the list.)

From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>

Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:39:54 +1100

Subject: Re: [OT] Entirely off-topic: English Civil War rules

From: "Roger Burton West" <roger@firedrake.org>

> I'm not much of a traditional wargamer: mostly I play SF, with a side

I;ve never played it - but have seen it played, and it looked so much
fun I am really tempted to get into that period.

De Bellis Renationis, DBR, from WRG (Wargames Research Group).
http://www.theminiaturespage.com/rules/ren/dbr.html
There were a lot of criticisms of 1.0, but 1.1 may have solved them. Certainly
I've seen Tercios employed as very effective formations on the field, in fact,
the block of pikes with arquebusiers or musketeers at the corners is standard.

http://tetrad.stanford.edu/dbr/index.html

Oh yes, there's a scenario supplement, De Bellis Civille, which covers all
major ECW battles.

From: Mike.Elliott@b...

Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:08:34 +0000

Subject: Re: [OT] Entirely off-topic: English Civil War rules

I second Alan's recommendation of DBR. However, the scenario supplement "De
Bellis Civile" is not written by Phil Barker and contains many inaccuracies. I
suggest you avoid it. Its not that difficult to put together scenarios for DBR
if you give it a bit of thought.

Regards Mike

From: "Roger Burton West" <roger@firedrake.org>

> I'm not much of a traditional wargamer: mostly I play SF, with a side

I;ve never played it - but have seen it played, and it looked so much
fun I am really tempted to get into that period.

De Bellis Renationis, DBR, from WRG (Wargames Research Group).
http://www.theminiaturespage.com/rules/ren/dbr.html
There were a lot of criticisms of 1.0, but 1.1 may have solved them. Certainly
I've seen Tercios employed as very effective formations on the field, in fact,
the block of pikes with arquebusiers or musketeers at the corners is standard.

http://tetrad.stanford.edu/dbr/index.html

Oh yes, there's a scenario supplement, De Bellis Civille, which covers all
major ECW battles.

*******************************************************
This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
Registration No: 2706218.

Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained
in this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is
prohibited.

If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately, by
using the reply facility in your email software.

We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network for the
purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.

This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.

Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex,
TW8 9DH www.steria.co.uk
******************************************************

From: Tim Bancroft <tim@d...>

Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 18:40:33 -0000

Subject: Re: [OT] Entirely off-topic: English Civil War rules

Just as a general bit of praise and, as I've mentioned it to Roger privately,
I am a big DBx fan (been an umpire and have contributed to the