From: Richard Kirke <richardkirke@h...>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:53:21 +0000
Subject: [OT] armor penatration - angle is important
Scott, > Hi all, Welcome to our wonderful (and colourful!) community. > so if I goof up on this, have some forgiveness and don't flame out. I really wouldn't worry about that, we are on the wholea very calm list, with usually a very low level of flame. > Let me know if "wrong list", "off the subject" or something else This doesn't tend to stop most of us... traditionally posts that are not wholly relevant are marked [OT] in the subject headline. > I read one of the articles about angled armor and I >believe the author > missed the point. The angle that an >AP (armor piercing) round hits at <snip> > example. Yup you are absolutely correct,I believe that this was the consensus of the list after some discusion (though I may be wrong, I got borred with that string after a bit). Very elegant example! I like it.