From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:08:39 -0500
Subject: [OT] AAR format
I assume the USN and other navies have their standard formats for AAR's. Can anyone either provide a link to a training document that describes this, or send me a summary? If it's long, send it offlist
From: Ted Arlauskas <ted@n...>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 23:38:27 -0800
Subject: RE: [OT] AAR format
> I assume the USN and other navies have their standard formats for The US Army has a Graphic Training Aid (GTA) that deals with running an AAR, GTA 8-1-2: Leader's Guide to After Action Debriefing. You can read it at: http://155.217.58.58/cgi-bin/atdl.dll/gta/8-1-2/080102_top.htm
From: Jesse Casey <jessecasey@n...>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 20:05:26 -0600
Subject: Re: [OT] AAR format
From: Ted Arlauskas <ted@naxera.com> Subject: RE: [OT] AAR format > The US Army has a Graphic Training Aid (GTA) that deals with running see also http://155.217.58.58/cgi-bin/atdl.dll?type=fm&type=gta&school=ANY for listing of other FMs and GTAs
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 20:40:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] AAR format
> The US Army has a Graphic Training Aid (GTA) that deals with This is interesting but not what I am looking for. It's for a squad or platoon level debriefing. I want the format a naval commanding officer would use for a formal report to his admiral after action.
From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:37:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
Subject: Re: [OT] AAR format
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Jesse Casey wrote: > From: Ted Arlauskas <ted@naxera.com> people always seem to use that IP number for the Army Training and Doctrine Digital Library web server; it's much prettier (not to mention more future-proof) to call it www.adtdl.army.mil, as in: http://www.adtdl.army.mil/cgi-bin/atdl.dll/gta/8-1-2/080102_top.htm http://www.adtdl.army.mil/cgi-bin/atdl.dll?type=fm&type=gta&school=ANY and, yes, the abbreviation for Army Training and Doctrine Digital Library is ATDDL, not ADTDL. the army is here to shoot, not to spell.:) tom
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 19:30:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT] AAR format
> people always seem to use that IP number for the Army Training Which is better looking but doesn't help my quest for a Naval report format. No one has mailed me directly, either. Don't we have at least one squid in the audience?
From: JRebori682@a...
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 22:32:44 EST
Subject: Re: [OT] AAR format
In a message dated 1/8/00 8:19:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, > laserlight@quixnet.net writes: > Which is better looking but doesn't help my quest for a Naval Sorry, mate. But as a lowly petty officer, I never even got to see one of those. Wish I had.
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:20:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [OT] AAR format
> Which is better looking but doesn't help my quest for a Naval OK, I can't speak for the squidleys, but I can tell you how USMC AARs are typically formatted. Keep in mind that there is no "written in stone" format. This is just how it's usually done. Also realise that this type of AAR, designed to inform a CO of problems and potential solutions, may not be the most entertaining for FT. AAR FORMAT (I) General Overview of Operation (II) Overview of Positive Aspects (III) Overview of Negative Aspects (IV) Specific Enhancement of Positive Aspects (A) Situation 1 (B) Idea to Enhance Sit. 1 (C) Situation 2, etc. (V) Specific Correction for Negative Aspects (A) Situation 1 (B) Idea to Correct Sit. 1 (C) Situation 2, etc. (VI) Personal Comments Not Covered Above See? Pretty dry, but very effective for what it was designed to do: fix problems.
From: Roger Books <books@m...>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:52:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [OT] AAR format
> On 8-Jan-00 at 20:22, Laserlight (laserlight@quixnet.net) wrote: At least one, but I was never a 0.