From: Alfredo Lorente <alfredo@b...>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 08:07:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[SG & DS Supplement
Hmmm.... > > Well, add another to the minority. I would much rather see I don't think we are, neccesarily, such a minority after all. I would imagine at least eight messages reiterating or supporting this thought, but this is certainly not the most read thread going on right now... Is there a more scientific way to establish this?
From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 22:59:51 -0400
Subject: RE: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[SG & DS Supplement
I'll support this and so do three other gamers here not on the web! Owen Glover IT Services > ----------
From: Joe A. Troche <trochej@s...>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 11:44:32 -0400
Subject: RE: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[SG & DS Supplement
I thought More Thrust (in some cases:)) added too much to Full Thrust. Oh sure, I don't have to use any of the new toys but every rug rat in PDX insists on using missiles and cloaking devices and doesn't want to play the quick and fun core rules anymore. Thank You GZG! > At 12:59 PM 8/29/97 +1000, you wrote:
From: Jon Davis <davisje@n...>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 13:33:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[SG & DS Supplement
> trochej@spiritone.com wrote: You're correct about the cloak and other aspects of MT. I enjoy the additional sensors and EW rules. The addition of missiles changed the game dramatically and PDAFs and ADAFs should have been given better odds of killing them. Although I'm not using it in my PBeM games, I'd prefer a 5+ for a missile kill as a house rule.