Off topic, was Re: Star Fleet Battles

4 posts ยท Mar 16 1997 to Mar 17 1997

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>

Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 14:24:06 -0500

Subject: Off topic, was Re: Star Fleet Battles

> On Sat, 15 Mar 1997, Out of my mind. Back in five minutes. wrote:

> The only thing I can verify for you is that Marvin Lamb (who is

As a (very junior, though) member of the SDS, I can confirm this. Marvin is
the head of the SDS. You forgot one thing, though: upcoming Starfire products
will be published in electronic format 'til we can work up a market for
printed products again; TFG didn't dare to print anything, and the severe lack
of support and new products for Starfire hasn't helped at all.

Later,

From: Niall Gilsenan <ngilsena@i...>

Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:16:58 -0500

Subject: Re: Off topic, was Re: Star Fleet Battles

> As a (very junior, though) member of the SDS, I can confirm this.
Marvin
> is the head of the SDS. You forgot one thing, though: upcoming

Did they ever getaround to releasing the 4th interstellalr war supplement? If
not are there any plans for irs release?

From: Matthew Seidl <seidl@v...>

Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:34:23 -0500

Subject: Re: Off topic, was Re: Star Fleet Battles

> "ngilsena" == ngilsena <ngilsena@indigo.ie> writes:

> As a (very junior, though) member of the SDS, I can confirm

ngilsena> Did they ever getaround to releasing the 4th interstellalr ngilsena>
war supplement? If not are there any plans for irs release?

Yes, its next in the works. They have just released SM#2, a great supplement
if I do say so myself. For more up to the date info, subscribe to the starfire
mailing list. Contact me directly for subscription info.

From: Indy Kochte <kochte@s...>

Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 20:17:30 -0500

Subject: Re: Off topic, was Re: Star Fleet Battles

[...]
> event as I deleted it). In it he has basically stated that further
Marvin
> is the head of the SDS. You forgot one thing, though: upcoming Starfire

Ah, yes, that's right. My apologies on this oversight. What I get for trying
to use my meager memory buffer after I've deleted the evidence.
:-}

Mk